I guess the fact that CLW and
HLG have third party tested PAR and pfdd and shenzen lights charts are simply made up (and their diodes are likely counterfeit) i can rest assured the budget light would lose measurably.
I've seen my lights pitted against
HLG, Fluence and a local COB builder at our local shop. What I got from it was
HLG and Fluence had more coverage area per watt and results were about on par with HPS results, just way more efficient. The CLW however does something to plants. More biomass, more roots, and more essential oils. COB was like using HPS but with half the watts and just as much heat.
I'd put it like this...if I was a commercial grower in a large open space, Fluence would probably be my choice and if extracts were my goal which they are, it's CLW.
Then there's personal preference on light size which I prefer a smaller fixture and using a mover to spread coverage rather than a large fixture being either a board or rails to cover my 3'x10' footprint. I also grow various sized plants with no concern about an even canopy so 2-3 smaller light plays well into that rather than a single large fixture.
Only thing I really dont like about CLW is the need for fans. The more moving parts the more that can break down. But they pack a lot in that little fixture and the heat sinks are the size of bricks and heavy as a cinder block so I get the need for the fans.
Compare to a fan cooled fixture from China it's insane what they're trying to get away with using undersized heat sinks and crappy pc fans with no lifespan