Seamaiden
Living dead girl
- Posts
- 23,594
- Reactions
- 34,048
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2010
- Points
- 638
Not just that, but there are young people who hold those anti-pot beliefs, too. Being forward thinking, believing in individual rights, all that sort of thing is not the exclusive domain of youth. Its domain lies in belief structures.As far as the old/young stuff..... my sig should say "I've forgotten more than I remember"
I DO hear what he was sayin' about the old views, but when ya step back and think about the fact that there are 60-70 year olds (and beyond) who have not only smoked weed, but who tripped acid and had lifestyles goin' on that the kids today can barely suss as they "emo" and "jackass" (and they are that stupid without Ludes? WTF?) and believe, as we also did...that a whole buncha what they are experiencing/feeling is something new that no one else ever felt/experienced before.
same shit, different day.... LOL
s h
How is my state passing a proposition going to affect your state not passing it? Your state is one of the states that lined up and insisted the DOJ took matters into their own hands should California have passed the proposition, which is amusing considering the history and all.Well all I can say is dont come to Tx and get caught with bud, not if you value ur freedom and hard earned cash. MMJ maybe helpin other states but not here. We cant even get MMJ on the ballot! So yea I'm pissed P19 didnt pass. I have to live in one of those states a full year to get a drivers license etc.
So I guess what I'm sayn' is I need a place to live guys! WILL WORK FOR WEED!
Also, in California, if you move here and don't get a drivers license from our state within a certain period of time you'll be dinged pretty hard. I don't know which state has a residency requirement before you can gain ID, that's pretty screwy and makes no sense whatsoever.
I'm going to posit something for you, see if it's a thing you might be able to wrap your head around--perhaps one of the reasons "older" voters like myself voted against 19 is manyfold. Perhaps it's because we actually took the time to read it, whereas the VAST majority of the young people I've spoken with haven't read anything more than the title of the proposition. Perhaps older people voted no because we saw what a badly written proposition it is.
Do you think that's plausible?