caveman4.20
- 5,969
- 313
Not to mention established FARMERS aren't they the most prepared and are they organizing???
Sorry but regardless of how you feel, thats still not the case. they have already been granted grow licenses and much of that won't be talked about until they are ready for rescheduling- which until they get what they want ready why would it be brought to public attention. They have also been looking into other avenues of cornering the market. So believe what ya want, but they are ready to get involved.
Sorry bud, but ive def heard of pharma trying to get involved already over the last several years in some interesting ways. Heard they already hold some licensing that isn't much talked about as well.
^^^double like!Lastly, Hemp is the game changer.
Annual, little to no ferts, water...
Plenty of fiber and fuel.
Somehow during WWII, when we were pushing efficiency on everything we had, Hemp was more efficient than Forests....
But that is also the same reason I stay out of California, somehow my cigarettes cause cancer once I cross the border :)
Interesting study. 600 a unit for indoor with the current people producing it seems a but cheap. I'm not saying it can't be done. But in a for profit model that doesn't leave much wiggle room. The Rand study has major flaws IMO.Here's a study by Colorado Futures Center analyzing the state's likely income under a64. They're concluding a lb will wholesale at $600 and retail at $2959.
,Interesting study. 600 a unit for indoor with the current people producing it seems a but cheap. I'm not saying it can't be done. But in a for profit model that doesn't leave much wiggle room. The Rand study has major flaws IMO.
Big Pharma and Big Tobacco are most definitely looking at Colorado.After the last three years?
Anyhow, they got to keep it high, otherwise where's the profits for Pharma outfits if your Meds will only cost $5/pack. That's 'Marlboro Country' there.
And with their success at seed to sale, I see no reason for them not to shoot for the stars and beyond.
Quite an astute observation. The security requirements with 106-1284 have pretty much solved Denver's warehouse vacancy problems of years past.It's the devil in the Nanny State, yet they do hospital tests with pure thc and cbd IV, and have licensed grows for GW, with Otsuka being the sole US distributor.
"GW and Otsuka are collaborating on the US development of Sativex. The initial target indication for FDA approval is cancer pain. Sativex is currently undergoing a Phase IIb/III clinical trial in cancer pain."
I think this is right up Tobacco's alley anyway (it's a plant, they already fight the gov't daily, this one doesn't kill people [rebranding]), so disagree they are fully rallying against it. No good for the Alcohol industry, besides dank brewers, but big alcohol would be fully against it.
Pharma is already there, recreationally? Why not, plenty of 'medicines' or derivatives are spun off into commercial, non-prescription, offerings.