squiggly
- 3,277
- 263
Yes that's exactly it..Marxist for lack of better words(or understanding)..he's not pleased Liberals or Conservatives. He had both Houses in first term and failed to pass Single Payer health care system and instead Obamacare. Which I predict will fail miserably defacing his party and that a Single Payer Act will be signed in the future by a Republican no doubt.
I'm not speaking about the DOJ AP leaks...what do we know of intimidation tactics taking place amongst all the hoopla as of late? We don't, but that's assuming. Time will tell and your right all this is nothing new.. not even 100 years old new..but it doesn't excuse the abuse or fix the problem. We can only hope that WW3 doesn't break out with Obama at the helm or we might kiss the rest of our Civil Liberties goodbye.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~ Ben Franklin
"But I know that the people who are involved in these programs... They're professionals. In the abstract you can complain about Big Brother and how this is a program run amok, but when you actually look at the details, I think we've struck the right balance." Obama on NSA spying by way of FISA
Surely these "professionals" will never abuse FISA..lol. No one will ever abuse NDAA.
as a side note Squiggley...you should rip a few bongs and do some more reading.
The GOP is already posturing on how to repeal Obamacare by way of Single Payer.
lol you are a serious dick-riding fan-boy..relentless! I'm trying to stay on topic here..not debate your love affair. Are you that fucking deluded...Obama signed NDAA! Most Americans could care less about their Civil Liberties until they find out they themselves have been trampled on, good for Obama and his fan boys, like you. That doesn't fix that NDAA is contrary to Bill of Rights. It seems the Obama Administration is doing a lot of "damage control" lately. If he's doing such a great job he wouldn't be insulted by his own party members on the daily.
Congress runs the show, read the Constitution again if you're confused about that.
Uhhh..prolonged detention?
He escalated Afghanistan and kept Guantanamo open.
Dropping Drones and now the sanctions in Iran.
Granted Iran has to be dealt with as should Israel with their threats for escalating, but generally speaking people don't know how horrible sanctions can be to an already hyper-inflated economy.
During Bush the sanctions on Iraq were lowly estimated that 500,000 human beings under the age of 6 died as a direct cause of sanctions. He went from an apology tour to restore the world's view on the US to business as usual.
The reason why we are hearing more and more backlash in the media about shit every other Prez has gotten away with in the past is because of the coming Obamacare...it looks to be hurting our recovery already.
It is what it is and the best hopey changey shit we can pull out of our collective asses is that we can right the ship and re-write what Obama has done so as not to be so damaging and actually please more than it displeases everyone.
"Not sans habeas corpus."
Feinstein-Lee Amendment actually expands detention without a judge to civilians in the US under AUMF. Habeus Corpus would do little for someone detained within the Military without access to lawyers, family, or the court itself. sans civil liberties ..God help if that expands to simple government critics during wartime...i.e. dissidents
I do not have enough chronic to make me believe this fucking bullshit! There is no way that the Republican party will embrace "social healthcare", or the single payer act. This is written by one pundit, that is it! I could never see the Republican party as it is today, split between fiscal and social conservatives, the ability to embrace this act. Essentially this pundits idea is how can we get Obama and destroy Obamacare.......by doing what every liberal has hoped would come out of the insurance fiasco in the ACA, establishing a single payer option. Remember Pelosi and many top dems were one hundred percent for the single payer act and it did not go through due to the watering down to the original bill/idea that Obama did in order to appease the right.as a side note Squiggley...you should rip a few bongs and do some more reading.
The GOP is already posturing on how to repeal Obamacare by way of Single Payer.
Obama could have vetoed NDAA, he didn't. That was THE biggest civil liberty loss in history.
I do not have enough chronic to make me believe this fucking bullshit! There is no way that the Republican party will embrace "social healthcare", or the single payer act. This is written by one pundit, that is it! I could never see the Republican party as it is today, split between fiscal and social conservatives, the ability to embrace this act. Essentially this pundits idea is how can we get Obama and destroy Obamacare.......by doing what every liberal has hoped would come out of the insurance fiasco in the ACA, establishing a single payer option. Remember Pelosi and many top dems were one hundred percent for the single payer act and it did not go through due to the watering down to the original bill/idea that Obama did in order to appease the right.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?