Dopegeist
- 702
- 93
Well instead of just taking Advanced Nutrients word on it, here is a recent study.
And they are injecting these rats with large doses, Mammalian Toxicity starting pg 10
"No evidence of DNA damage or repair was noted in an in vivo UDS assay. PBZ had no effect on 12
either fertility or dominant lethality in mice in a dominant lethality test. Based on these in vitro
and in vivo mutagenicity tests, it was concluded that PBZ is not genotoxic."
"There was no evidence of carcinogenic effect of PBZ in rats or mice."
Not organic.
Why is Advanced against it, b/c they don't sell it.
Why did it not make EPA approval, b/c Monsanto don't own it. Nobody here thinks they use their lawyers to keep competitive products off the shelves too?
In the end do what you feel is right, but there are a lot of claims made in the 'industry', made by companies, that amount to little more than opinion. Advanced is notorious for this.
And they are injecting these rats with large doses, Mammalian Toxicity starting pg 10
"No evidence of DNA damage or repair was noted in an in vivo UDS assay. PBZ had no effect on 12
either fertility or dominant lethality in mice in a dominant lethality test. Based on these in vitro
and in vivo mutagenicity tests, it was concluded that PBZ is not genotoxic."
"There was no evidence of carcinogenic effect of PBZ in rats or mice."
Not organic.
Why is Advanced against it, b/c they don't sell it.
Why did it not make EPA approval, b/c Monsanto don't own it. Nobody here thinks they use their lawyers to keep competitive products off the shelves too?
In the end do what you feel is right, but there are a lot of claims made in the 'industry', made by companies, that amount to little more than opinion. Advanced is notorious for this.