THCFarmer.com
121,286 Members Log In Register
Log In Register

Slow growth since switching to LED

  • Thread starter Thread starter Weedgrower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Slow growth since switching to LED

Weedgrower 138 Replies 29,962 Views
Page 7 of 7 · Replies 121–139 of 139
#121
rolandrog said:
buy a par meter for $500 instead of any other equipment.
Click to expand...
I’m glad i got the controller instead of the par meter, gives me so much more control over my DLI than any meter would do. I just need to learn now how to spot light stress early on like the pros here and learn where the sweetspot is at.
 
#124
#129
Ok now I'm 3 days into flower and this is what I see on one plant on only a few leaves, is this ca mg deficiency? @Aqua Man and community.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20220522_025356797.jpg
    PXL_20220522_025356797.jpg
    209.8 KB · Views: 46
#130
Weedgrower said:
Ok now I'm 3 days into flower and this is what I see on one plant on only a few leaves, is this ca mg deficiency? @Aqua Man and community.
Click to expand...
Aquaman had the 1st LED pic that impressed me ever! He's obviously an elite grower, and had some high yielding genetics. I believe he said he used 450 watts approx on the plant.
I don't see how this isn't undisputable evidence HPS lighting is superior
I pollinated 3 of these, and yielded this. I'm not a better grower than Aqua, but how else can this be explained? I'm in 1/2 gal containers if that. I had to chop the heads off as they were getting up in the light.
My conclusion after seeing 100's, if not 1000's of LED grows, HPS are superior. Period!
20210811 162220
20210812 020438
20210815 030814
20210815 030940
 
#131
Weedgrower said:
Ok now I'm 3 days into flower and this is what I see on one plant on only a few leaves, is this ca mg deficiency? @Aqua Man and community.
Click to expand...
It's just an excerpt of the pic, but it looks as if you got a good amount of foliage of big fans covering the shoots that generate all the budsites. Maybe warranting some selective pruning...
 
#132
N1ghtL1ght said:
It's just an excerpt of the pic, but it looks as if you got a good amount of foliage of big fans covering the shoots that generate all the budsites. Maybe warranting some selective pruning...
Click to expand...
He should cut a bunch of thoes sucker branches, as a lot of those little tops will end up as larf, and steal the energy from the colas that will develop. It will also minimize chance of disease. That will open things up, but those fan leaves come in handy at the end.
Overall the plant looks good. Maybe some overfeeding, but that should take care of itself during the stretch
 
#133
N1ghtL1ght said:
It's just an excerpt of the pic, but it looks as if you got a good amount of foliage of big fans covering the shoots that generate all the budsites. Maybe warranting some selective pruning...
Click to expand...
I've done that alot more this time round, I didn't want to de foliage too much and stress the plants. If you recommend getting rid of a few more big fan leaves of the top I agree, just don't want to stress them
 
#134
Let's not turn this into an HPS vs LED debate please. All I will say is that if you were correct then every major grow on the planet would be running HPS. Which as we know is not the case.
 
#135
Tasty Buds said:
He should cut a bunch of thoes sucker branches, as a lot of those little tops will end up as larf, and steal the energy from the colas that will develop. It will also minimize chance of disease. That will open things up, but those fan leaves come in handy at the end.
Overall the plant looks good. Maybe some overfeeding, but that should take care of itself during the stretch
Click to expand...
it's too early for lollipopping after the stretch is over the bottom can be cleared but as of now the promotion of sideshoots to become big colas is the priority to increase floral uniformity/ bagappeal and have less danger of budrot at the main cola.
sideshoots need direct light or will stay small or develop stretchy, both unwanted.
 
#136
N1ghtL1ght said:
it's too early for lollipopping after the stretch is over the bottom can be cleared but as of now the promotion of sideshoots to become big colas is the priority to increase floral uniformity/ bagappeal and have less danger of budrot at the main cola.
sideshoots need direct light or will stay small or develop stretchy, both unwanted.
Click to expand...
CBD2FA3B 5D1A 40E2 98AB 769DC2074249
 
#137
Ok now I'm very confused. I'm 3 days into 12 12 and one of my plants are showing signs of flowering as if they have been in flower for 2 weeks? Never experienced this before. Any reason?
 
#138
Lpena93 said:
View attachment 1247277
Click to expand...
Fine. So the plant is growing better when half of the light hits the bottom of the tent?
60327 2

^^ in soil. (even without bugs) though yeah, they will come and just adapt to the DE... <.<

Weedgrower said:
Ok now I'm very confused. I'm 3 days into 12 12 and one of my plants are showing signs of flowering as if they have been in flower for 2 weeks? Never experienced this before. Any reason?
Click to expand...
maybe genetics don't know how does it actually look?
 
#139
N1ghtL1ght said:
Fine. So the plant is growing better when half of the light hits the bottom of the tent?
View attachment 1247498
^^ in soil. (even without bugs) though yeah, they will come and just adapt to the DE... <.<


maybe genetics don't know how does it actually look?
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20220523_231900077.jpg
    PXL_20220523_231900077.jpg
    223.5 KB · Views: 46
  • PXL_20220523_231851519.jpg
    PXL_20220523_231851519.jpg
    233.2 KB · Views: 44
  • PXL_20220523_231849052.jpg
    PXL_20220523_231849052.jpg
    130.7 KB · Views: 40
Page 7 of 7 · Replies 121–139 of 139
Back
Top Bottom