REALSTYLES
- Posts
- 340
- Reactions
- 1,117
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2015
- Points
- 143
im curious to what you guys have spent building your own panels.im talking to those last few posts with pics where it looks like the panel is 4x4 maybe and the plants are 2-3feet tall.
why ,do you think my last question was to piss these guys off? its an honest question because im trying to see how big these panels are and what kind of space they cover vs how big there plants are.my plants are almost always 5 x 5 x 5 and the mars 2 i just picked up was 700.00 and from what i see it seems to cover a 5x5 real well.it just looks like some or most of the plants posted so far are about 24 inches tall so i asked lol. but i thought one of the major benefits of led was the wider mixed spectrum to mimic more like a sun spectrum.but i see these guys building single or dual spectrum panels.why not just use a gavita then ?
why ,do you think my last question was to piss these guys off? its an honest question because
well if i built my own i would have to account for another 200-300 for my time spent doing it plus i would want it all incased in steel like production lights are so i can sleep at night knowing it wont burn my shit to the ground lol.
What thread are we in@tags420 I wasn't actually taking that out of context...your personality type is that of you only divulge information when your ego is inflamed as when you are calm you tend to think you are better then others....I am researching what type LED to get as I am going that route for my indoor as my outdoor 1billion watt sun does a phenomenal job of light production...but the way to pick your brain is to get you frustrated and only then do you come forward with healthy information....sorry to get you flustered....
In any case...what is your opinion on the Spectrum King...say as apposed to the other consumer/commercial grade LEDs
They are great. The only commercial panel I recommend. Expensive...but they work like they are supposed to.So how you like those apache fixtures?
So maybe you should pull out that hps and put the apache in there ,do us a lil side by side with yours vs their's type gig?
I'm not understanding...
Not sure what your deal is and why you want to take that out of context.
Do you want to give up 20-30% in yields for a .5% increase in cannabinoids and terpenes?
The same influences that impact taste in leafy greens are not consistent with cannabinoids and terpenes in cannabis. I have done multiple side by sides of led and hps, using both monos, whites, white/red variations. All white combinations increase cannabinoids by 2-4% over hps, while and some red/blues combos were under hps.
You act like they are crushing anything else, or even clearly superior in anyway. HPS, MH, and CMH all have done amazing jobs at near maximizing production, potency, and bag appeal.
While every "industrial" light is producing well below the efficiency of HPS. People think sodiums are inefficient for some reason... 1.8-2+µmols/w stomps 99% of led's in the world period as well as all other tech...and no matter what they will not replace an hps with less wattage if they aren't e to equal in efficiency yet. It's just physics and plant physiology. So until they can keep up on a photon count and prove(in anyway) that they are needed to maximize potency and phenotypical expression of cannabis...I will always be going for the empirical results.
And again...my garden is pure led...and beating HID and other led's. And I paid a premium for it and always have. I don't cut any corners or downgrade my meds. Thanks
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?