i understand what you mean, i think. i know while reading a review, i skip those "asides", i usually read reviews for the actual review of the actual light by the actual guy reviewing it. they want to treat the thread like a plea for help, instead of an "information only" thread.
after the review, unless one has questions regarding the setup or the actual light during the process, then the "help" and asides and "what might have been" should be posted and perused. but till you review it using your methods and protocol, these other inputs confuse people like me (new and dumb and oft times stoned)
i can look at BigCubes other grows, and see what can happen at his hands then look at this review and note differences and benefits. if i compare the 20 differing opinions in the thread, i have no baseline.
just my preference, as an idjut about growing and the plethora of accoutrements, if it is labeled "review of..." that is sort of what i want to see in the thread.