1diesel1
Staff
Supporter
- 11,189
- 438
I didnt say topdressing thats the problem number 1. I am not talking about a handful of neem scattered on the top soil. I am talking about good amount of neem cake worked into the soil. Relying mostly on neem as your fertilizer needs.
I am explaining myself and you are saying there are no research. I told you there are no research. Its logic. Its my claim.
One application of azadirachtin stays in the plant tissue for 20 days.
Two application of azadirachtin would probably be in the plant tissue for 40 days if the application has been done in 20 day intervals.
Now following the same logic, ıf you supply a constant source of neem, there will be azadirachtin in the plant tissue as long as there are azadiracthin in the rootzone.
No, been sick for 2-1/2 weeks. Today’s the first day I been able to work my spider mite and thrip infested garden.Why?
Is it because you were getting the DE wet?
I have the data to back it up. Just look at the study i posted.Ok I see, so your just saying it’s because what you think ? It’s confusing because your quoting charts and studies so I assumed you had data to back up your logic.
I think the problem is your association of azadirachtin to neem cake or oil as if it’s the same thing. Sure it’s a constituent but where people are failing these tests for residuals is where there using products like azamax, which is purely a extract. It’s not even neem anything at that point, it’s a ingredient derived from neem, nothing more
I didnt say topdressing thats the problem number 1. I am not talking about a handful of neem scattered on the top soil. I am talking about good amount of neem cake worked into the soil. Relying mostly on neem as your fertilizer needs.
I am explaining myself and you are saying there are no research. I told you there are no research. Its logic. Its my claim.
One application of azadirachtin stays in the plant tissue for 20 days.
Two application of azadirachtin would probably be in the plant tissue for 40 days if the application has been done in 20 day intervals.
Now following the same logic, if you supply a constant source of neem, there will be azadirachtin in the plant tissue as long as there is azadiracthin in the rootzone.
I have the data to back it up. Just look at the study i posted.
Do you know how much azadirachtin left in the seeds after extraction?
Who cares about a toxic douche :)I looked and I’m not seeing it .....
Who cares about a toxic douche :)
Who cares about a toxic douche :)
Do as you please. It clearly says in that study, the application of neem cake protects against mites and thrips, at least helps with it.
My logic is sound, i dont have a lab at my disposal sooorry.
Hahhahha. This is from a study which i cannot get my hands on at the moment. There is clearly uptake of azadirachtin from the roots. I cannot conduct a big research so you can be pleased. If you have the time and money be my guest and share the results please.Because I questioned your statement , your mad and I’m a toxic douche ? LMAO.
I’m not debating that the meal has pest reducing properties because it does, it’s an added benefit. Claiming azadirachtin stays in the plant for x amount of days and assuming azadirachtin Is present in the leaf because some graph you found on a weed forum says so is great logic and how misinformation get started passed around.
What were the details of the study of that graph ? They could have been using a pure
azadirachtin extract which is where most people are failing lab tests but neem gets the bad wrap. Yet your throwing this logic around as it’s fact.
Yeah i am mad because this is not an intelligent discussion, you are not providing anything here. Not one study, nothing.I have zero desire to argue and won’t argue , I’m only trying to have a intelligent discussion. Only one guy here mad and calling names
Toochay! Very good point! The facts are the facts.Yeah i am mad because this is not an intelligent discussion, you are not providing anything here. Not one study, nothing.
If you shared one measly study here that backs your idea, than ok, i would gladly debate and if i am wrong i can apologise for misleading.
But nothing.
This is what is toxic.
Thank you!Toochay! Very good point! The facts are the facts.
Because of our quest for knowledge to make our grows better and stronger with the most possible natural remedies that nature can supply to us.Then why am i doing this research to find studies
You are unintentionally agreeing with me.I’m not debating that the meal has pest reducing properties because it does, it’s an added benefit.
...
They could have been using a pure
azadirachtin extract which is where most people are failing lab tests but neem gets the bad wrap. Yet your throwing this logic around as it’s fact.
Thank you!
This is what makes me crazy.
Not someone debunking my idea, my ideas could be false, my logic could be false but people rejecting the facts and studies.. while providing nothing to back their claims.
Then why am i doing this research to find studies for a person who couldnt give two shits about them.
Where is the intelligence in this debate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?