C
CannaCaino
- 12
- 1
Thanks for the reply, Dizzle.
Why the doubling up of the trees? I'm assuming it's so you can make the two into one large super-tree of sorts. Is this right? Do you think you could overcome that by using CO2 through both veg and bloom and producing a larger single plant that way? I'm thinking about 16k in a layout like this.
X X X X X
O O O O
X X X X X
O O O O
X X X X X
O O O O
X X X X X
O O O O
X X X X X
What do you think of that? It seems like you would recommend I have two everywhere on the inside where they are getting 4k each and instead have them all getting 2k each. I like the idea of 25 plants rather than 34, just to keep overall numbers easily under 60 with veg and moms. Then again, it looks like from previous posts that you use more of a diamond shape and would arrange them differently where each plant would at most get 3k if they weren't doubled up.
Caino
Why the doubling up of the trees? I'm assuming it's so you can make the two into one large super-tree of sorts. Is this right? Do you think you could overcome that by using CO2 through both veg and bloom and producing a larger single plant that way? I'm thinking about 16k in a layout like this.
X X X X X
O O O O
X X X X X
O O O O
X X X X X
O O O O
X X X X X
O O O O
X X X X X
What do you think of that? It seems like you would recommend I have two everywhere on the inside where they are getting 4k each and instead have them all getting 2k each. I like the idea of 25 plants rather than 34, just to keep overall numbers easily under 60 with veg and moms. Then again, it looks like from previous posts that you use more of a diamond shape and would arrange them differently where each plant would at most get 3k if they weren't doubled up.
Caino