Oh, if it's Cammie, and you wanna dance, honey, I will
dance with you. You've put a fat, wiry hair right across *this* woman's ass just with your business tactics, never mind your personal behavior.
Seamaiden took my crown as post whore after I was banned, hahahaha :)
Laugh my FUCKING ASS OFF! Yeah!
:banana1sv6:
:dance
So you're saying that everyone who posted great results in their LED grow threads was lying? There have been a number of side by side comparison grow threads on the net using HydroGrowLEDs showing better results than HIDs.
And an equal number of threads showing buds that are about on the level of Mexican brick weed in terms of appeal.
I'm not saying they're lying, I'm saying that
for the broader market they are not going to consistently produce in a manner anywhere near what HIDs will produce. I have
yet to lay my eyes on LED-grown bud that I would want. I am a very hard sell, but endeavor to keep an open mind and have done plenty of reading myself. I haven't seen any cannabis grown by LEDs that makes me say, "Yeah, I've gotta do that!" And we pay out the ASS for electricity, so it's not like I don't want to save some money in that area.
I have yet to see a unit that would offer me anything resembling a decent return on investment, either, which again relates directly to the quality of the end product. Although, I will certainly keep watching because I do believe that both the potential is there, and that it's necessary to reduce the power footprint as long as we make electricity using things like coal.
Now, if you're talking about lighting for
aquatic photosynthetic organisms... that's another thing
entirely. I can point you to a few places where people are growing rather difficult species (SPS corals, anemones, and Tridacnid clams, aka giant clams--all with extremely high light requirements, comparable to cannabis
except with regard to wavelength/spectrum), especially in terms of lighting requirements, very well with LEDs.
