MIMedGrower
- 17,190
- 438
Our goal in this study was to evaluate the effect of 1× rate (132.7 kg ha−1) and 2× rate (265.4 kg ha−1) livestock manure treatments compared to control (without manure) on the growth and yield parameters of chilli peppers grown under three different environmental conditions such as a plastic greenhouse, rain-shelter plastic house, and open field conditions.
The nutrient salts are listed about halfway down the article. Not in the beginning. I found that odd too.
The baseline nutrient salts yes. That they both start with.... they then give one set organic manure, and the other nothing.
Prolly because ALL nutrients are chemicals.Just read the study. They do not compare it to "chemical" nutrients. At all..
The study basically says, giving the plant organic fertilizers is better than not giving them any..
At no point in this article do they compare it to regular nutrients.
Therefore it proves nothing I havent already admitted.
They literally dont compare it to any other nutrients. At all.
OK best organic grower and best nute grower here, I will send you both free seeds. Grow your best way an send finished nugs to Cannasaurusrex. I will conduct a double blind taste test and send nugs for quantitative analysis, to the person on the left side of the couch. We will report back with our conclusions. that's enuff stience for everyone here...right? PM for my addy pls.
Agreed. It's a great article. Hope you all read it .
“
Ammonium nitrate (34%), fused phosphate (17%), and muriate of potash (52%) were applied as inorganic sources of N, P, and K. Recommended doses of the chemical fertilizers N, P (P2O5), and K (K2O) were 80 : 50 : 40 kg ha−1, and this amount was divided into three equal portions. The first part was applied as a basal dose and the two remaining portions were given during the vegetation period. All other agronomic operations such as plant protection, weeding, and irrigation measures were conducted similarly in all plots.
“
Right. And it spurred higher growth and yield. They mention increased biology in the soil.
I think that plants prefer varied sources of nutrients.
Yeah, lets be clear this means synthetic "chemical" fertilizers, this really peeves me.They basically have 3 plots with the same soil containing "chemical" fertilizers.
Yeah, lets be clear this means synthetic "chemical" fertilizers, this really peeves me.
THC is about the worse chemical of them all CBD is pure Satan though.Yeah, bothers me too. I mean lots of it's not even synthetic, it's just derived from other sources.
Calling it chemical is an easy boogeyman though. The word alone scares some people, even though they themselves are just a bag of chemicals, full of chemicals.
LOL no thats south of the border, its the Mounties and Agriculture Canada here, but I don't shill for either of them respectable (cough) agencies, Its perfectly legal to gift an ounce in the mail between Canadians over 21, so. I'm not asking for anything bad mmmkay? LMAO I guess no one is sending me weed....so so sad...I dont have any 'chem nute hydro erb' to compare with my overloaded quasi organic heavy metal soup mould soil weed though...feel free to send your wicked inorganic kind to my pre-epidemic personal stash dept.??? I'm not good at this at all...back to the cave, drops granite spade, and walks away.You work for the DEA, im not sending bud across state lines! Lmao
That was a cheap shot, you fight dirty. LOLYou work for the DEA
Potassium fertilizer components often come from mined potassium sulfate, and are 'chem' ferts, not 'synthetic' and also organic input approved. So we can pick apart any study,(especially the term 'organic') but generally cultivation methods that are detrimental to the natural world, could possibly be less beneficial for the humans consuming it. Not a stretch, not bro science, but a logical assumption? Steince can argue that with laser focused experiments point by point, but no one will fund a study that isn't tainted by economic influences lolsynthetic "chemical" fertilizers
Yes, I considered this, cultivation methods are a separate discussion, I don't see why they couldn't be employed with synthetic components to the same end, I have no beef with proponents of permaculture, I'm actually all for it.Potassium fertilizer components often come from mined potassium sulfate, and are 'chem' ferts, not 'synthetic' and also organic input approved. So we can pick apart any study,(especially the term 'organic') but generally cultivation methods that are detrimental to the natural world, could possibly be less beneficial for the humans consuming it. Not a stretch, not bro science, but a logical assumption? Steince can argue that with laser focused experiments point by point, but no one will fund a study that isn't tainted by economic influences lol
Potassium fertilizer components often come from mined potassium sulfate, and are 'chem' ferts, not 'synthetic' and also organic input approved. So we can pick apart any study,(especially the term 'organic') but generally cultivation methods that are detrimental to the natural world, could possibly be less beneficial for the humans consuming it. Not a stretch, not bro science, but a logical assumption? Steince can argue that with laser focused experiments point by point, but no one will fund a study that isn't tainted by economic influences lol
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?