EVOKE
- 3,172
- 263
welcome CGG... really cool looking sativas... have u heard of Dr.grinspoon From barney farms...
thanks man!welcome CGG... really cool looking sativas... have u heard of Dr.grinspoon From barney farms...
I grew out one seed it turned out to be a male i have a few more but its a 120 sativa... i might grow out a few in december...thanks man!
Yeah, ive heard of it and read about it, but ive never had the chance to grow it or try it yet. How bout you?
I grew out one seed it turned out to be a male i have a few more but its a 120 sativa... i might grow out a few in december...
I strongly suggest reading this month issue of Skunk Mag Vol 8 Issue 3 its was written by Myles of CaliGoldGenetic's (The person who started this thread) It discusses the future of cannabis genetic's were possible in the future there will be seeds that are Pentacussate - 5 branches at each internode or Octacussate 8-branches at each internode - which will eliminate the need for fimming and topping and have it built into the genetic's. It is a very interesting read to say the least and there are pictures of some ....check it out.... nice work Myles ....... peace SoSer................well maybe I should of read the rest of this thread before posting as I noticed he posted some pictures above -non the less was were interesting ........
heHey CGG!!! I read your article in that issue a while back, and I saw your "Topa Mountain Purple Thai" I believe it was called , in one another skun issue one of the quarterly releases. I've been trying to find you online and finally I came here. Will you be releasing seeds of your Thai plants? I've been researching old school heirloom landraces and Thai varieties are my next focus. Thanks in advance!!
If it is a mutation that many seek , hence fimming , topping , what would be the harm Fish and excuse my ignorance but i currently have two kids sitting with me in the last year of college and one is a english major and neither i nor they know what monsanto'ish mean ..... respect soserMaybe im crazy but genetically altering/breeding mutations into MJ seems a little monsanto'ish to me,why would we want to fuck up a good thing?
? for ? are you referring to the post of reading myles 's article if so you can quote that post and put you question comments under it, if that is what u are referring to your welcome .... seen you only posted twice so figured you were talking about that, welcome to the farm also.......peace soserThanks for the heads up Soser.
Hey whats happening farmers, I'm Myles and I just wanted to introduce myself and Cali Gold Genetics. We're fairly new as a company, but our roots in breeding and growing go back over three decades. We have a special place in our heart for equitorial landrace sativas, and most of our varieties we have bred to retain our favorite sativa characteristics from electric, up and racey, to stoned, confused and scared. We would love to find some test growers, and I hope to meet some fellow sativa farmers, and anyone else who wants to share knowledge and possibly trade genetics.
Ok soser maybe were not on the same page,i dont consider fimming or topping to be genetically altering the plant myself although im sure i could be wrong,you can top or train all you want but it doesnt change the plants genes or dna or the structure of what we naturally have,now on the other hand if you DO change the genes or dna or how it would naturally grow by altering it genetically in some way im not a fan of that.Monsanto is a company that has done just that with our food crops to produce more yield than otherwise possible but it has caused side effects that are not so great hence my "monsanto'ish" comment,maybe i should have said like monsanto and it would have been more grammattically correct,If you check your urban dictionary you will find that "ish" on the end of any word means "kind of" or "sort of" so what i meant was that was kind of or sort of like monsanto.I was not sure if i screwed it up or not so i asked my daughter who told me its not proper english but two 3rd year college students should have gotten the just of it,she would give them a c+ at best for comprehension,lol,she is a sociology proffessor at one of the larger universities in boston and while she doesnt teach english she does have a masters in it and a couple books to her credit.Please forgive me as im a simple businessman and not schooled in proper english,no one on the construction sites seems to notice.If it is a mutation that many seek , hence fimming , topping , what would be the harm Fish and excuse my ignorance but i currently have two kids sitting with me in the last year of college and one is a english major and neither i nor they know what monsanto'ish mean ..... respect soser
Hey CGG!!! I read your article in that issue a while back, and I saw your "Topa Mountain Purple Thai" I believe it was called , in one another skun issue one of the quarterly releases. I've been trying to find you online and finally I came here. Will you be releasing seeds of your Thai plants? I've been researching old school heirloom landraces and Thai varieties are my next focus. Thanks in advance!![/quote
Yeah we'll be coming out with a few diff Thai variants. I dont know how it works here at the farm with the seeds and the auctions and stuff, but i'll be in touch with you. Im stoked to hear your wanting to work with the hierloom Thai varieties, I think a lot of the great modern strains have the old Thai genetics as parents. I think working with the killer old school candy Thai varients [with flavors in the candy cherry, berry, juicy fruit line of flavors and the sweet and sour as some old timers called it, (most likely a relative of the lemon grass type strain/ flavor of some Thai's) , or another killer yet slightly later on and diff one the Chocolate thai, which came in the years following the original candy and sweet and sour Thai imports] is nearly essential for breeding killer sativa hybrids
Cant wait to see your research and any Thai treasures you might find along the way:)
Ok soser maybe were not on the same page,i dont consider fimming or topping to be genetically altering the plant myself although im sure i could be wrong,you can top or train all you want but it doesnt change the plants genes or dna or the structure of what we naturally have,now on the other hand if you DO change the genes or dna or how it would naturally grow by altering it genetically in some way im not a fan of that.Monsanto is a company that has done just that with our food crops to produce more yield than otherwise possible but it has caused side effects that are not so great hence my "monsanto'ish" comment,maybe i should have said like monsanto and it would have been more grammattically correct,If you check your urban dictionary you will find that "ish" on the end of any word means "kind of" or "sort of" so what i meant was that was kind of or sort of like monsanto.I was not sure if i screwed it up or not so i asked my daughter who told me its not proper english but two 3rd year college students should have gotten the just of it,she would give them a c+ at best for comprehension,lol,she is a sociology proffessor at one of the larger universities in boston and while she doesnt teach english she does have a masters in it and a couple books to her credit.Please forgive me as im a simple businessman and not schooled in proper english,no one on the construction sites seems to notice.