Perception
- 453
- 93
Here is a of the microscope I've been using. I think it's an LW Scientific Observer 3.
No, it makes perfect sense and matches my understanding.I should have worded myself better but i am not English so sorry :) Anything that is confusing please highlight so I can perhaps rethink my choices :) or we can do this in Estonian :)
The purpose of foam fractionation, or protein skimming, is entirely different in the aquatic world--the sole goal is to remove 'pollutants'. This is because, especially in reefkeeping, we're trying to mimic what are actually very, very nutrient-poor waters (part of the problem, as I'm 100%+ you already know, with the world's coral reefs is agricultural and mining run-off, mostly in the form of things like NO3) as these are necessary for achieving a very particular set of parameters necessary to both hermatypic and non-hermatypic (reef building and non-reef building) benthic invertebrates. This does indeed include the very same groups or families of nitrifying microbes that we're harnessing to work with us for our terrestrial soil cultivation needs (obviously not the same species, but they do the same thing, oxidize NH3/NH4 and other forms of N into less toxic forms).I suspect the basic principles of aeration are similar for ACT as for Fish for example, the key is just making sure that as the microbes use the oxygen, that we have enough being replaced. If we dont, we will see a reduction in bio diversity as appears to be the case here. In our tests, Teas absent in fungal content are not worth using as a foliar :) I suspect most people who ramp teas as useless are missing the significance of O2 ppms on an ability to brew a foilar disease counters etc.
and since I'm over 50 I have LOTS of eye floaties.
The purpose of foam fractionation, or protein skimming, is entirely different in the aquatic world--the sole goal is to remove 'pollutants'. This is because, especially in reefkeeping, we're trying to mimic what are actually very, very nutrient-poor waters (part of the problem, as I'm 100%+ you already know, with the world's coral reefs is agricultural and mining run-off, mostly in the form of things like NO3) as these are necessary for achieving a very particular set of parameters necessary to both hermatypic and non-hermatypic (reef building and non-reef building) benthic invertebrates. This does indeed include the very same groups or families of nitrifying microbes that we're harnessing to work with us for our terrestrial soil cultivation needs (obviously not the same species, but they do the same thing, oxidize NH3/NH4 and other forms of N into less toxic forms).
So we're actually glad to see foaming in our skimmers, and that skimmate is considered a waste product. Another member here is toying with the idea of using the skimmate for feeding his plants, because it's a whole lot of concentrated goodies.
I guess what I'm driving at is the balance that must be achieved between maintaining appropriate DO levels and *not* causing foam fractionation to occur. Bigger bubbles? That's been my answer, but I haven't been testing DO levels, just looking at the bugs in the student scope, and since I'm over 50 I have LOTS of eye floaties.
lolThose eye floaties are so annoying! "Oh, is that a nematode!? Nope, it's just in my eyeball".
yes i know, it was just as much a kick in the wallet for us, but we havent looked back since. I have faith in the scope, the thing is easy to use and it allows me to be as specific as possible without really hardcore gene testing there is no way we could afford with the frequency we would need :-) I know its a lot of money, for me it was a long saving project, and as with all things, it is a matter of need. While the subject may be of interest, it might not match economic intentions. this I totally get. Estonia is the very poor nation. Ergo the corrupt politician who leads my town can swing votes by offering nothing more than a bag of winter fire wood and a sack of potatoes to buy his passing to Parliament, despite very obvious and public knowledge of his nature.That's a big step up from the cheapie student scope I've been using, but it does go to 400x.
No, it makes perfect sense and matches my understanding.
hahaha nice :-)
your welcome sir ;-)Yet another gem...... Thanks friend:D
ideally you would have something that includes bacillus amyloliquefaciensI'm getting ready to run a second batch. Have a small powdery mildew (or some kind of mold fungus) issue on some of the young cannabis plants in veg closet. I've been spraying with mild herbal anti-fungal/mold concoctions, but it's only suppressing the mold - not irradicating.
Give that, I'd like to foliar spray with a fungally dominated ACT. Sound correct? I was wondering if anyone has ever used a myco-starter to help jumpstart the fungus in brew. Like Myco-grow from fungi.com http://www.fungi.com/product-detail/product/mycogrow-for-vegetables-1-oz.html
I was thinking I'd sprinkle a pinch on the compost while it is prepping for 24hrS with a tiny bit of wheat bran and BSM, before I put in brewer. Thoughts?
I meant to add, BSM around mold is no Bueno buddy. I get the point of the Bran, but I think increasing SA is a little late in light of the presence of mildew now. People have made good suggestions re milk etc.I'm getting ready to run a second batch. Have a small powdery mildew (or some kind of mold fungus) issue on some of the young cannabis plants in veg closet. I've been spraying with mild herbal anti-fungal/mold concoctions, but it's only suppressing the mold - not irradicating.
Give that, I'd like to foliar spray with a fungally dominated ACT. Sound correct? I was wondering if anyone has ever used a myco-starter to help jumpstart the fungus in brew. Like Myco-grow from fungi.com http://www.fungi.com/product-detail/product/mycogrow-for-vegetables-1-oz.html
I was thinking I'd sprinkle a pinch on the compost while it is prepping for 24hrS with a tiny bit of wheat bran and BSM, before I put in brewer. Thoughts?
yes, they are a good way to be more certain that you have at least a glomus or two and some trichoderman for example. Go for a high spore count product that has been reviewed. Lots of very low rent mycos aboutOh, but back to the question - has anyone ever used myco-starters in an ACT brew to boost fungal hyphae?
yes if you run IR, dont forget, IR passes through air without warming it up, only when it hits an object, say a leaf, does it give up its energy as heat, so, any room temp is based on the heat minus the IR, meaning a plant room that reads 27C is likely reading closer to 30C+ internal plant temp, once we factor in IR from HID or other sources.This is great. I'll calculate my VPD in my veg closet this weekend. I've got an IR thermometer so can get leaf temps pretty well. I've been making the assumption that my veg closet had a low RH (high VPD) because the air that is being pumped in to it is low RH (40-50% - which is from the flower room). BUT... I never actually measured it. I think it's a good bet to guess that I have a low VPD.
I'll try Seamaiden's suggestion of milk, and maybe the Baking soda. Thanks