caregiverken
Fear Not!
- Posts
- 11,534
- Reactions
- 33,216
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2011
- Points
- 438
Most people eat round up everyday
Most people eat round up everydayAnd OTOH some consumers don't give a shit and would smoke bud dipped in Round-up right after harvest.
TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Toxicological Data:
Data from laboratory studies on this product are summarized below:
Oral: Rabbit LD 50 : 300 mg/kg
Dermal: Rat LD 50 : >5,000 mg/kg
Inhalation: Rat 4 - hr LC 50 : >2.09 mg/L
Eye Irritation: Rabbit: Moderately irritating
Skin Irritation: Rabbit: Slightly irritating Skin
Sensitization: Not a contact sensitizer in guinea pigs followin g repeated skin exposure.
Subchronic (Target Organ) Effects: Abamectin is a central nervous system depressant. Overexposure to abamectin may also affect skin and eyes. Abamectin is a GABA agonist. G ABA is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter. Repeated ov erexposure to N - Methyl 2 - pyrrolidinone (NMP) may cause effects to eyes, skin, respiratory system, central nervous system, liver and kidneys. Repeated overexposure to ethyl lactate may cause effects to eyes, skin and respiratory system . Inhalation of high v apor concentrations can cause central nervous system depression and narcosis.
Carcinogenicity / Chronic Health Effects: There was no evidence of carcinogenicity in animal studies using abamectin. No increase in tumors was seen in rats via dietary or inhalation exposure to NMP for two years; however, an increase in liver tumors was noted in mice receiving high dietary doses over a similar period. Liver tumors are not uncommon when non - genotoxic chemicals such as NMP are tested in the mouse bioassay. Prolonged overexposure to ethyl lactate may cause irritation of eyes and skin.
Reproductive Toxicity: In laboratory animal studies with abamectin, effects on reproduction have been seen only at doses that produced significant toxicity to the parent animals. NMP ma y adversely affect reproduction in rats after ingestion, although fertility is unaltered.
Developmental Toxicity: In animal studies with abamectin, developmental effects were observed at doses that were also toxic to the maternal animal. Fetal development al effects were observed following ingestion, inhalation and dermal exposures to NMP in pregnant animals, and occurred both in the presence and absence of maternal toxicity.
Genotoxicity: Animal tests with abamectin did not demonstrate mutagenic effects. N either in vitro nor in vivo tests on NMP demonstrated mutagenic effects
so are you gonna keep fucking up Kens thread to feed your own righteous ego?? SeriouslyListen, I'm right there with the next man about doing what we have to to support our family.
But we all have decisions and I choose not too use shit poison like avid on my own shit or others shared sold or suppository or however the method
so are you gonna keep fucking up Kens thread to feed your own righteous ego?? Seriously
The fully flowering plants I would chop down.... I will only use AVID if I got at least 60 days 2 go away..
Most people eat round up everyday
I bet he does, lets see if he will comment @squiggly :)True dat. And I really don' know the differences (if there are any) in comparison to ingesting versus smoking. I'd have to guess there would be different absorption rates between the two. Maybe Squiggs would know.
Melting point: 155-157 degrees C (4)Well, let's cover the basics:
For smoking you're actually basically vaporizing the material. The THC that actually gets burned undergoes a chemical change and is no longer THC and it doesn't fuck you up at all. However, the burning material atop the bowl/bong/joint/what-have-you is a source of heat which goes to the lower down material and vaporizes THC out of the bud much the same way that a forced hot air vaporizer like a volcano does.
There are different flavors and probably different terpenes make their way through with burning vs not burning vs eating--and this among the different metabolic rates for the different routes of uptake produce the different highs a person might experience using the same bud but different methods.
When we're talking pesticides and other unwanted chemicals, a very similar argument applies. Depending on what the boiling points are for these pesticides, some of them might be burned (destroyed) and some of them might be vaporized and taken in along with the THC. There are other things to consider but in general this is how to think about the process. You're destroying some but getting some too.
With eating, you're basically getting everything.
With vaporization, depending on the boiling points of the stuff you don't want you might be able to vape without ingesting them at all.
Well, let's cover the basics:
For smoking you're actually basically vaporizing the material. The THC that actually gets burned undergoes a chemical change and is no longer THC and it doesn't fuck you up at all. However, the burning material atop the bowl/bong/joint/what-have-you is a source of heat which goes to the lower down material and vaporizes THC out of the bud much the same way that a forced hot air vaporizer like a volcano does.
There are different flavors and probably different terpenes make their way through with burning vs not burning vs eating--and this among the different metabolic rates for the different routes of uptake produce the different highs a person might experience using the same bud but different methods.
When we're talking pesticides and other unwanted chemicals, a very similar argument applies. Depending on what the boiling points are for these pesticides, some of them might be burned (destroyed) and some of them might be vaporized and taken in along with the THC. There are other things to consider but in general this is how to think about the process. You're destroying some but getting some too.
With eating, you're basically getting everything.
With vaporization, depending on the boiling points of the stuff you don't want you might be able to vape without ingesting them at all.
With eating, you're basically getting everything.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?