Log In Register

Should I add UVB Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LaVirtue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Should I add UVB Light?

LaVirtue 561 Replies 102,570 Views
Page 5 of 29 · Replies 81–100 of 562
What's the brand and wattage again?

Wattage is 40 per tube, but I have UVA and UVB light meters, which is really what we want to focus on I think.

I'm OK with buying new bulbs for this test, we just need to do it really soon.
 

Wattage is 40 per tube, but I have UVA and UVB light meters, which is really what we want to focus on I think.

I'm OK with buying new bulbs for this test, we just need to do it really soon.
Have a link to the bulbs? So I can see the ratios
 
Really cool interview w solacure founder!


Screenshot 20210323 091557

Screenshot 20210323 091803


The purdue paper

 
Really cool interview w solacure founder!


View attachment 1105720
View attachment 1105721

The purdue paper

Here is an awesome, free paper on how this works. What a gold mine! Several awesome graphics. I need to get to a computer to sit down and summarize but i learned more from this than i have learned from the rest of my research combined re: uvb.

 
Last edited:
Seems... unsatisfying. Range in distance and time is massive. 12" at 4 hours is probably 20X more photons than 2 hours at 24, maybe more. There has got to be an equation for that.

Also, my bulbs do not measure the same, and they are different depending on what part of the bulb you measure.

I just ordered 2 new bulbs because these are old and used. Hopefully I will get more consistent readings with new bulbs, and that can help determine the testing parameters.
 

Holy crap, I just learned I don't have a clue. They are even using UVB on cotyledons. The whole last 2 weeks of flower comes seriously under question based on that paper.

I need to step back from this a minute and look at the big picture. Within this UV testing there are about a billion variables. 😳
 
Here is an awesome, free paper on how this works. What a gold mine! Several awesome graphics. I need to get to a computer to sit down and summarize but i learned more from this than i have learned from the rest of my research combined re: uvb.

IMG 20210323 142939661
IMG 20210323 142946372


Here is my attempt to show how i am thinking about it. Sorry about the childish handwriting...i will edit with typed captions lol.
 
Look guys cannabis plans have a very specific way of defending themselves against UV rays they build trichromes to block the, kind of like we use sunscreen. So by adding UV to your grow, or like most LEDs come with UV these days the plants grow more trichomes to keep themselves from burning. It's as simple as that look it up...
 
Look guys cannabis plans have a very specific way of defending themselves against UV rays they build trichromes to block the, kind of like we use sunscreen. So by adding UV to your grow, or like most LEDs come with UV these days the plants grow more trichomes to keep themselves from burning. It's as simple as that look it up...
Your post is misleading at best, and flat out wrong at worst.

We don't do bro science here.
 
So this is wrong...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210323-133940.png
    Screenshot_20210323-133940.png
    510.5 KB · Views: 255
Yeah they also build them for insects and other things but it's basically a defense mechanism...
 
View attachment 1105797View attachment 1105798

Here is my attempt to show how i am thinking about it. Sorry about the childish handwriting...i will edit with typed captions lol.

You have very eloquently stated what the jumble in my head is trying to reduce to simple terms.

I think this will lead to a series of tests to really get usable info.
 
So this is wrong...
Not wrong, just inadequate and incomplete. First of all UV WHAT?

FWIW, I can build a blog post that says anything I damn well please (especially if I am selling something), link to it, and claim argument victory? Nope, show me science, not stuff written to such a basic level they don't even distinguish between the spectrums of UV which have VASTLY different effects on the plant.

Nobody is saying we know everything here, except maybe you?

One primary benefit of science is to be able to predict outcomes. This is what we are working towards here.

Sorry if I pissed you off with the bro science comment, just trying to hold this discussion to a higher level.
 
Last edited:
Well my grow lights just have UV and I have definitely seen an increase in trichome production since I've started using the lights that have UV included...
 
Not wrong, just inadequate and incomplete. First of all UV WHAT?

FWIW, I can build a blog post that says anything I damn well please (especially if I am selling something), link to it, and claim argument victory? Nope, show me science, not stuff written to such a basic level they don't even distinguish between the spectrums of UV which have VASTLY different effects on the plant.

Nobody is saying we know everything here, except maybe you?

One primary benefit of science is to be able to predict outcomes. This is what we are working towards here.

Sorry if I pissed you off with the bro science comment, just trying to hold this discussion to a higher level.
Lol didn't piss me off just wanted to show that I wasn't wrong...
 
You're right Bill Nye the science Guy this is your thread I'm sorry....
 
Well my grow lights just have UV and I have definitely seen an increase in trichome production since I've started using the lights that have UV included...

OK sir, let me try to see if we can close this gap between us.

I ask you again, how do you measure this? Visually? Explain your controls in place to see the same plant with and without UV (again UV WHAT) and how you compared them. If visually, please post your pics so we can understand. Closest thing we have to a peer review process.

Second, assuming you can prove added trichomes, how does that relate to cannabinoid content? Terpenes? Please show your test results.

Third, what are the spectrums, amounts / intensity, and the DLI you are running on the UV?

Lets start there and see where this goes.

Your buddy Bill.
 
I'm definitely no scientist just a stoner who likes to grow better Bud each time...
Your basic bro.
 
Page 5 of 29 · Replies 81–100 of 562
Back
Top Bottom