Log In Register

The Fat Leaf Breeding Project

  • Thread starter Thread starter lino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

The Fat Leaf Breeding Project

lino 189 Replies 28,677 Views
Page 4 of 10 · Replies 61–80 of 190
@MandyJane has some other seeds of crossses Ive made from the cannabinus crossed with some other rare flowers. I hope to see them germed this soon.
Cannabinus = hemp? I've never heard of it, that would explain the crazy growth. How does the cannabinoid work breeding it with a drug type? Does it have an interesting terpene profile?
 
Idk about cannabinus but I hear more and more about Coloradans growing smoking and breeding hemp or cbd plants...
I would be interested in a plant that makes you feel good or take the edge off with out pissing dirty...
 
Idk about cannabinus but I hear more and more about Coloradans growing smoking and breeding hemp or cbd plants...
I would be interested in a plant that makes you feel good or take the edge off with out pissing dirty...
You heard correct, I'm working with Otto #1 x Ken's GDP myself and getting it tested soon, hence my being interested in linos hemp work.
 
Cannabinus = hemp? I've never heard of it, that would explain the crazy growth. How does the cannabinoid work breeding it with a drug type? Does it have an interesting terpene profile?

Correct sir,,, scientist lied when they recently classified HEMP. The indians and many continents trade to tell botanist that HEMP was not cannabis, but even chistoper columbus botanist got it wrong it aint pot.

Scientist knew they were straight telling lies when this HEMP classification was made for Aslinger and his crew to outlaw cannabis.

Indians in Florida told em its Indian Hemp, not cannabis but even back then is got confused by guys with too much college and not enough bong experience to classify, But this last science classification of this nomenclature was a straight up lie.
 
Correct sir,,, scientist lied when they recently classified HEMP. The indians and many continents trade to tell botanist that HEMP was not cannabis, but even chistoper columbus botanist got it wrong it aint pot.

Scientist knew they were straight telling lies when this HEMP classification was made for Aslinger and his crew to outlaw cannabis.

Indians in Florida told em its Indian Hemp, not cannabis but even back then is got confused by guys with too much college and not enough bong experience to classify, But this last science classification of this nomenclature was a straight up lie.
So Cannabinus can be trippy? Sativa trippy?
 
You heard correct, I'm working with Otto #1 x Ken's GDP myself and getting it tested soon, hence my being interested in linos hemp work.

Here how I piss clean

PissTest
 
So Cannabinus can be trippy? Sativa trippy?
very dangerous to consume. Mongolians used the drug for war and massacres . Its a very dangerous plant to handle, spines that will light you up.
The tea is good for circulation and fighting. I used it till the Oly Committy banned iit
 
very dangerous to consume. Mongolians used the drug for war and massacres . Its a very dangerous plant to handle, spines that will light you up.
The tea is good for circulation and fighting. I used it in the Olympics till it got banned.
Hmmm, interesting...I'm more interested in the cerebral sativas...Cool though.
 
Fucking nuts
thats what I say every time I grow it... the pure cannabinus grow 16' to 23" in a small pot. I'd like to see how high I could soar those pure cannabinus cloud climbers with some big pots and PH water.

Ive got flowers up to 12 inches in abusive growing... I like to see the size of one grown with luv,..
CannaL

This is the mutts that mandy has... not pure cannabinus but dam close .
 
Cannabinus = hemp? I've never heard of it, that would explain the crazy growth. How does the cannabinoid work breeding it with a drug type? Does it have an interesting terpene profile?
Terpene - thats the crazy thing about cannabinus , its terpene profile and leaf structure is how come its scientific name resembles cannabis. vThey're very simular, That is why you will rarely here me use its common name of Hibiscus , its much closer to cannabis but scientist have to classify it hibiscus cuz of the perfect flower,,, So can we speculate that cannabinus is the missing link to cannabis as it can be forced pollination with some chems to cannabis... hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Sceintist found a new one just a few weeks ago 300,000 y old bones,,, monkey or man,,, they arguing...
 
Can humans change sex w/o an operation ?

YES ! ! ! human can be bred just like our plant hermies! pls continue reading. HUMANs change sex AFTER BIRTH !

YES, there are true race of HUMAN Hermaphrodites in the Dominican Republic. Sorry, Id post links- but to much abstract science for you guys and the other links proving my claims are aimed at transgender acceptance and equality bullshit. i'm not here to spreading that shit on gay pride week. I'm talking about science, in fact I feel that this gene should be castrated or genocide and yes they will want to throw out of class if your Human hermy killer and not a HUMAN hermy breeder. I was warned of being banned for just suggesting Quarantined hermy's at a minimum.

How do humans change sex w/o an operation?
the MeGI (pronounced Me Guy) gene In humans, its called the SRY gene, it control enzymes and other compound in our body that determine how gay you are. A male like myself throws homozygous over testosteroned males that cant be gay, they want to beat up gays. In a natural environment these males will not change sex,,, you'd have a hard time changing the HUMAN sex organs on these HUMAN males even with chemical induction. heterozygous recessive HUMAN gay hermy males will convert to females thru chemicals easier and HUMAN heterozygous gay/hermy Dom males can change with no out side chemicals like the strain/race of hermphodites humans in the Dominican Republic.

Why are we getting an escalation in gay human females lately and why has the gay population went from .01 - 5% of population to rising amt of gays, the population of heterozygous gays risen slightly lately?
Dont confuse the SRY DNA gene delima above with the complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), CAIS - that is what is causing the sexual abnormalities that are occurring at a higher rate lately in the USA in Humans.
This is whats screwing up our kids but read the last sentences.

This is my high school biology course study - that sex chromosomes determine a baby’s sex, full stop: XX means it’s a girl; XY means it’s a boy. But on occasion, XX and XY don’t tell the whole story. <careful with the liberal propaganda,,, i'm copying and pasting here>

Today we know that the various elements of what we consider “male” and “female” don’t always line up neatly <scientific propaganda verbage crap> , with all the XXs—complete with ovaries, vagina, estrogen, female gender identity, and feminine behavior—on one side and all the XYs—testes, penis, testosterone, male gender identity, and masculine behavior—on the other. It’s possible to be XX and mostly male in terms of anatomy, physiology, and psychology, just as it’s possible to be XY and mostly female.
<thats worded into a lie but you guys will know the truth cuz you breed cannabis hermies so you know the real deal> quote - lol - ( XY and mostly female ) BUllshit you're either born XY or XX or a true Hermy.

Each embryo starts out with a pair of primitive organs, the proto-gonads, that develop into male or female gonads at about six to eight weeks. Sex differentiation is usually set in motion by a gene on the Y chromosome, the SRY gene, that makes the proto-gonads turn into testes. The testes then secrete testosterone and other male hormones (collectively called androgens), and the fetus develops a prostate, scrotum, and penis. Without the SRY gene, the proto-gonads become ovaries that secrete estrogen, and the fetus develops female anatomy (uterus, vagina, and clitoris).
<all that is true science, no bullshit interjected there>

But the SRY gene’s function isn’t always straightforward. The gene might be missing or dysfunctional, leading to an XY embryo that fails to develop male anatomy and is identified at birth as a girl. Or it might show up on the X chromosome, leading to an XX embryo that does develop male anatomy and is identified at birth as a boy.
<all that is true science, no bullshit interjected there>

Genetic variations can occur that are unrelated to the SRY gene, such as complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), in which an XY embryo’s cells respond minimally, if at all, to the signals of male hormones. Even though the proto-gonads become testes and the fetus produces androgens, male genitals don’t develop. The baby looks female, with a clitoris and vagina, and in most cases will grow up feeling herself to be a girl.
<all that is true science, no bullshit interjected there>

<read this copy & paste lie propaganda bullshit>
Which is this baby, then? Is she the girl she believes herself to be? Or, because of her XY chromosomes—not to mention the testes in her abdomen—is she “really” male?
<that is the dumbest question EVER!>
In the CAIS example that gay.
LAST sentence
Understanding the levels of gay means you understand zygosity explained in bibles and by the Greek gods, your now a hermy plant breeder and you can now breed them accordingly. if you're heterozygous gay dont be trying on makeup and womens cloths and of your plants are heterozygos gay you better understand this so you'll know if you want to stress/dress those plants into hermys. If their Dom homo gays you'll ruin crops in you dont know what you're doing.
panty urges - take some testosterone
stay away from soy milk
bitch tits stay away from soy milk
eat lots of organic veggys.
If you like fighting and beating up gay guys drink some soy milk be careful , lol
my educational jokes ended here.
90% of the increase in the gay population is a fad/bullshit/mental confusion, its not hormonal nor is it physical . Its a mental mind fuck on kids and its called feminizing boys & girls, media-animate-cloths-propaganda...Many cultures feminize boys. Fact jack... Donald Trump! ! !
 
Can humans change sex w/o an operation ?

YES ! ! ! human can be bred just like our plant hermies! pls continue reading. HUMANs change sex AFTER BIRTH !

YES, there are true race of HUMAN Hermaphrodites in the Dominican Republic. Sorry, Id post links- but to much abstract science for you guys and the other links proving my claims are aimed at transgender acceptance and equality bullshit. i'm not here to spreading that shit on gay pride week. I'm talking about science, in fact I feel that this gene should be castrated or genocide and yes they will want to throw out of class if your Human hermy killer and not a HUMAN hermy breeder. I was warned of being banned for just suggesting Quarantined hermy's at a minimum.

How do humans change sex w/o an operation?
the MeGI (pronounced Me Guy) gene In humans, its called the SRY gene, it control enzymes and other compound in our body that determine how gay you are. A male like myself throws homozygous over testosteroned males that cant be gay, they want to beat up gays. In a natural environment these males will not change sex,,, you'd have a hard time changing the HUMAN sex organs on these HUMAN males even with chemical induction. heterozygous recessive HUMAN gay hermy males will convert to females thru chemicals easier and HUMAN heterozygous gay/hermy Dom males can change with no out side chemicals like the strain/race of hermphodites humans in the Dominican Republic.

Why are we getting an escalation in gay human females lately and why has the gay population went from .01 - 5% of population to rising amt of gays, the population of heterozygous gays risen slightly lately?
Dont confuse the SRY DNA gene delima above with the complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), CAIS - that is what is causing the sexual abnormalities that are occurring at a higher rate lately in the USA in Humans.
This is whats screwing up our kids but read the last sentences.

This is my high school biology course study - that sex chromosomes determine a baby’s sex, full stop: XX means it’s a girl; XY means it’s a boy. But on occasion, XX and XY don’t tell the whole story. <careful with the liberal propaganda,,, i'm copying and pasting here>

Today we know that the various elements of what we consider “male” and “female” don’t always line up neatly <scientific propaganda verbage crap> , with all the XXs—complete with ovaries, vagina, estrogen, female gender identity, and feminine behavior—on one side and all the XYs—testes, penis, testosterone, male gender identity, and masculine behavior—on the other. It’s possible to be XX and mostly male in terms of anatomy, physiology, and psychology, just as it’s possible to be XY and mostly female.
<thats worded into a lie but you guys will know the truth cuz you breed cannabis hermies so you know the real deal> quote - lol - ( XY and mostly female ) BUllshit you're either born XY or XX or a true Hermy.

Each embryo starts out with a pair of primitive organs, the proto-gonads, that develop into male or female gonads at about six to eight weeks. Sex differentiation is usually set in motion by a gene on the Y chromosome, the SRY gene, that makes the proto-gonads turn into testes. The testes then secrete testosterone and other male hormones (collectively called androgens), and the fetus develops a prostate, scrotum, and penis. Without the SRY gene, the proto-gonads become ovaries that secrete estrogen, and the fetus develops female anatomy (uterus, vagina, and clitoris).
<all that is true science, no bullshit interjected there>

But the SRY gene’s function isn’t always straightforward. The gene might be missing or dysfunctional, leading to an XY embryo that fails to develop male anatomy and is identified at birth as a girl. Or it might show up on the X chromosome, leading to an XX embryo that does develop male anatomy and is identified at birth as a boy.
<all that is true science, no bullshit interjected there>

Genetic variations can occur that are unrelated to the SRY gene, such as complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS), in which an XY embryo’s cells respond minimally, if at all, to the signals of male hormones. Even though the proto-gonads become testes and the fetus produces androgens, male genitals don’t develop. The baby looks female, with a clitoris and vagina, and in most cases will grow up feeling herself to be a girl.
<all that is true science, no bullshit interjected there>

<read this copy & paste lie propaganda bullshit>
Which is this baby, then? Is she the girl she believes herself to be? Or, because of her XY chromosomes—not to mention the testes in her abdomen—is she “really” male?
<that is the dumbest question EVER!>
In the CAIS example that gay.
LAST sentence
Understanding the levels of gay means you understand zygosity explained in bibles and by the Greek gods, your now a hermy plant breeder and you can now breed them accordingly. if you're heterozygous gay dont be trying on makeup and womens cloths and of your plants are heterozygos gay you better understand this so you'll know if you want to stress/dress those plants into hermys. If their Dom homo gays you'll ruin crops in you dont know what you're doing.
panty urges - take some testosterone
stay away from soy milk
bitch tits stay away from soy milk
eat lots of organic veggys.
If you like fighting and beating up gay guys drink some soy milk be careful , lol
my educational jokes ended here.
90% of the increase in the gay population is a fad/bullshit/mental confusion, its not hormonal nor is it physical . Its a mental mind fuck on kids and its called feminizing boys & girls, media-animate-cloths-propaganda...Many cultures feminize boys. Fact jack... Donald Trump! ! !
You might be interested in China and how communism and population control has affected sexual orientation. Your sick Lino like most of us, but atleast your trying to apply what you observe, rationally...Many zombie fucks don't even try to hide that they don't even enjoy their "Bliss" or "ignorance"
 
I will release the equations for the genetic code manipulation for cannabis Plants.
Next I will introduce the Tall gene in Cannabis for breeders, Up Next.
Pollen chuckers should probably at least read this also to get and understanding of possibilities and best practices in your breeding programs. This will walk students ass backwards but its the way I instruct. We ask the question, we look at answers and we prove for the correct answers. In this next example I answer the questions as a geneticist and then as a pollen breeder, this is a very important breeder tech tips;

Can a Dominate trait erase a Recessive trait, (gene) from a cannabis strain with our breeding programs?
This is where breeders and geneticists define a little different, Pheno and Genotype understanding is imperative when understanding Dom and Rec. ! But the simple answer is;
NO - this will be explained in detail in my next posts. Students will prove it with observation equations.
Why is the Tall Gene in Cannabis dominate?
Move your lite further away from plants to test a crop(A) of cannabis. What happens to the height of the crop that has the light placed very high above plants as compared to crop(B) that has light at close and ideal distance from the plants?
crop(A) will be taller than crop(B) - note this is comparative. Is this defined as Phenotype or Genotype?
I will answer this in the very next post in detail. This is a big answer that you will prove also with charts and learn how to breed cannabis.
Is a Cannabis (Tall) gene/trait dominate over the short gene?
You will prove this answer by reading my next postS. You will build a simple punnet chart in bout 5 minutes of thought. I will provide some pics of my test experiments of Tall and short gene at the end of this tutorial.​
 
Why is the Tall Gene in Cannabis dominate?

You should be surprised that the answer is in Dolly Pardon's feet. Why are Dolly's feet so small? The answer is the same, Things dont grow as good in the shade. Over time Many plants Tall gene have become Dominate. The taller plants that were able to out grow other plants get more sun and dominate in gardens and crops and especially in the wild. Taller plant in many types of plants are Dominate over the shorter plants.
This Taller gene is expressed as a genotype and its genetic designation is (T), Dominate.
The short plant genetic designation is (t), Recessive.
This can be proven in comparative analysis, with the equation in the next post. I will go thru the math equation step by step so dont be intimidated with this equation.

Greg Mendel proved that peas have a Dom (T) gene also.
 
Last edited:
chisq.gif

You might have seen this in math class. Guess what? This works for plant breeding also. We'll use this equation to examine the role of chance in producing deviations between observed and expected values. The test depends on an extrinsic hypothesis, because it requires theoretical expected values to be calculated.

We already started the equation.
'expected' Value = Cannabis Tall Plants Dom (T)
'observed' Value = equals punnet charts value ratios that you're about to build
You need to understand X squared. And (value)2
I'll explain the weird symbol in a moment.

The test indicates the probability of that chance alone produced the deviation between the expected and the observed values . When the probability calculated from Lino's chi-square test is high, it is assumed that chance alone produced the difference. Conversely, when the probability is low, it is assumed that a significant factor other than chance produced the deviation.

So why cant I just use a Punnet Chart to determine probability? What does the equation accomplish?
So check it out. Medel did not use statistics, and neither did Bateson, Saunders, Punnett, and Morgan during their experiments that discovered genetic LINKAGE. FYI i gave instruction on Sex Linked genetics breeding but lets not forget that colors and many traits will link to other trait, now to my fellow geneticist: this is where the pollen chucker have a Superior understanding of this they just dont know how to put it into science or charts.
SCIENTISTs here is a FYI, A geneticist combined with a pollen chucker will help you establish very informative starting points in your charts for instance;
If you ask you assigned Pollen Chucker to breeding program with a genetiscist and ask the PC about Tall Plants, he will have a seed bank that will have his plants already designated Sativa, they dont have that charted HOWEVER good Pollen Chuckers know many LINKED traits to their strains but not charted but you can develop your Hypothetical EXPECTED values with the correct questions of the PCs. The know Sex Linked traits but they dont know it you have to ask the correct questions to the PCs they can tell potencies, hermaphrodites, and many other Sex Linked traits to start charts with very accurate Expected Values.

So why the big stupid equation Lino?
How many times do you cross a plant and the results were not exactly what you expected? This equation proves if the plants genetics are correct AS COMPARED to what is claimed by the breeders claims.
This equations works for many statistical tests that we've applied to biological data, scientists judged the 'goodness of fit' between theoretical and observed experimental results simply by inspecting the data and drawing conclusions based on our Punnet Charts compared to our Prediction of the traits/gene. Although this method can work perfectly if one's data exactly matches one's predictions, scientific experiments often have variability associated with them, and this makes statistical tests very useful to prove your genetic designation (geneticist) ,
Pollen Chuckers - this will prove your Trait proclamations.

So what the hell is the funky symbol in that math equation?
It is called the Summation sign. Ppl use it to say they are wrong Zero times. X needs to equal Zero to show that we are never wrong in our prediction or "expected" Value. In our prediction we need to be close but not exactly at Zero. If we plant 500 plants will all the plants do exactly what we say ? And in this case of plant breeding our predictions will need to close to predictions but not exact. I'm not going to show the + and - value part of the equations. Lets just say we need to be close to prove DOMINANCE.
The symbol represents the sum of the Expected Frequencies of accuracy in Expected Values. Using this formula, the difference between the observed and expected frequencies is calculated for each experimental outcome category. The difference is then squared and divided by the expected frequency. Finally, the values for each outcome are summed together, as represented by the summation sign (Σ). We try to get as close to zero as possible. X = the value of inaccuracy.
 
Page 4 of 10 · Replies 61–80 of 190
Back
Top Bottom