Tnelz
- Posts
- 4,053
- Reactions
- 13,904
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2013
- Points
- 263
Ok So there is a major difference between the three. I've used them all. Have a thread on here start to finish in super coco. Stuff is great. But coco loco falls between the 2. Lightly amended where super coco is completely amended. And it's 30 bucks a bag. Coco loco is ocean forest with Coco. Extremely different from regular coco. Regular coco requires u to pay close attention to what goes on at what ph. I no longer bother phing and when I did with Coco loco the best ph I've found is from 6.0 to 6.4. Far different from the 5.6 to 5.9 in regular coco. Also with Coco loco u can just go with water whenever u want and it doesn't throw everything in the rhiosphere off. There is also a vast difference in consitancy. Coco loco is very similar to soil. In every way. Except u get all the benefits of coco. I've used every medium under the sun. Have my preferences with all of them. But haven't ever used anything that does what coco loco does. My ladies have never been happier. And the price point is perfect. Try it and u will see the differences I've pointed out and more.Not sure about coco loco specifically, I cant imagine it being any different than any other coco, I've seen multiple times people amending their coco, there is already a product being sold apparently called super coco, along the lines of what you were thinking, similar to super soil. But I would imagine the buffering capacity would have to come ammendments as well, coco buffers, but you might screw with the CEC. Also I prefer to feed coco like hydro applications, 3-12x a day on short cycles. Seems to work much much better imo than watering like dirt