Tnelz
- Posts
- 4,053
- Reactions
- 13,904
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2013
- Points
- 263
Ok So there is a major difference between the three. I've used them all. Have a thread on here start to finish in super coco. Stuff is great. But coco loco falls between the 2. Lightly amended where super coco is completely amended. And it's 30 bucks a bag. Coco loco is ocean forest with Coco. Extremely different from regular coco. Regular coco requires u to pay close attention to what goes on at what ph. I no longer bother phing and when I did with Coco loco the best ph I've found is from 6.0 to 6.4. Far different from the 5.6 to 5.9 in regular coco. Also with Coco loco u can just go with water whenever u want and it doesn't throw everything in the rhiosphere off. There is also a vast difference in consitancy. Coco loco is very similar to soil. In every way. Except u get all the benefits of coco. I've used every medium under the sun. Have my preferences with all of them. But haven't ever used anything that does what coco loco does. My ladies have never been happier. And the price point is perfect. Try it and u will see the differences I've pointed out and more.Not sure about coco loco specifically, I cant imagine it being any different than any other coco, I've seen multiple times people amending their coco, there is already a product being sold apparently called super coco, along the lines of what you were thinking, similar to super soil. But I would imagine the buffering capacity would have to come ammendments as well, coco buffers, but you might screw with the CEC. Also I prefer to feed coco like hydro applications, 3-12x a day on short cycles. Seems to work much much better imo than watering like dirt
I use grow stones exclusively. Both the large and small. The small are still the size of chunky perlite. A little more money but a far better product. I've used it from soil to Dec. The ebb and flow table I'm building will utilize grow stones as a medium. Not to mention the are made from recycled material in the USA. I met the owner of the company at the maximum yield event. Awesome guy. I completely recommend this product over perlite. Adds silica to you mix as well.I haven't tried the coco Loco yet, but hear nothing but great things about it. I just picked up a block of the roots organic. This brick is the regular cut. Last run I accidentally picked up a brick of the RO coco CHIPS by mistake. The store is a 3 hr round trip...so I just used it. I mix at basically 60/40 perlite/coco. I got amazing performance out of the chips running hempys! My thinking is that it seems to still hold water/nuts well...but gives waaaay increased airation to the roots. Anybody else had any experience with chips? Should the RO oco be rinsed? (Lmao...the chips ran fine with no treatment). Also...has anybody tried "Growstones" (http://www.growstone.com) as a replacement for perlite? The store was out of the #3 (preferred) and #4 perlite! (SHEESH...did I pick the wrong day to go to the store or what)?!!
Ty info is great too me . I need a medium that I can watch water and love. And when the girls are happy . I'm happy. So does coco loco, come in bales?Ok So there is a major difference between the three. I've used them all. Have a thread on here start to finish in super coco. Stuff is great. But coco loco falls between the 2. Lightly amended where super coco is completely amended. And it's 30 bucks a bag. Coco loco is ocean forest with Coco. Extremely different from regular coco. Regular coco requires u to pay close attention to what goes on at what ph. I no longer bother phing and when I did with Coco loco the best ph I've found is from 6.0 to 6.4. Far different from the 5.6 to 5.9 in regular coco. Also with Coco loco u can just go with water whenever u want and it doesn't throw everything in the rhiosphere off. There is also a vast difference in consitancy. Coco loco is very similar to soil. In every way. Except u get all the benefits of coco. I've used every medium under the sun. Have my preferences with all of them. But haven't ever used anything that does what coco loco does. My ladies have never been happier. And the price point is perfect. Try it and u will see the differences I've pointed out and more.
Brother I love the input. U know how we do. Its all opinion and what ur preferences are. U grow on a far larger scale than I do so ur knowledge is appreciated. Agree or disagree with me I want to hear it. Much much respect brother. Also my thoughts are totally in line with its on ph drift in coco. My overall point is for someone looking to move to a new medium coco loco gives u the relative safety of soil with all the added bonuses of coco without any of the possible coco headaches. Lol. Long sentence. Lol. So keep it flowing man. Have nothing but respect for u and how u do things.Also important to note, like stated above i wate every 30 min to an hr, keeps the CEC and rhizo in check. Might be mitigating alot of problems otherwise.. I'm only qualified to speak on what works for me lol
For sure brother, all love here. I totally agree with you, I like my shit to be exact all the time, so I don't mind taking the lumps of learning with coco, shit helps me really fine tune it. But you are so so right, the learning curve is much more steep than ammended stuff. Low buffering capacity, the CEC amongst other things can have your plants fried real quick if youre not on top of it. I actually think full hydro is easier than coco. I just hate dealing with 100 buckets or 10 tables, much easier dealing with pots.Brother I love the input. U know how we do. Its all opinion and what ur preferences are. U grow on a far larger scale than I do so ur knowledge is appreciated. Agree or disagree with me I want to hear it. Much much respect brother. Also my thoughts are totally in line with its on ph drift in coco. My overall point is for someone looking to move to a new medium coco loco gives u the relative safety of soil with all the added bonuses of coco without any of the possible coco headaches. Lol. Long sentence. Lol. So keep it flowing man. Have nothing but respect for u and how u do things.
For sure brother, all love here. I totally agree with you, I like my shit to be exact all the time, so I don't mind taking the lumps of learning with coco, shit helps me really fine tune it. But you are so so right, the learning curve is much more steep than ammended stuff. Low buffering capacity, the CEC amongst other things can have your plants fried real quick if youre not on top of it. I actually think full hydro is easier than coco. I just hate dealing with 100 buckets or 10 tables, much easier dealing with pots.
@giggles PLants look lovely btw, and really not trying to come off as a dick head but that glue shot for day 34 looks like it could be stacking harder for how healthy they look. Mind if I ask what your regiment is?
It should work juuuuuuust fine lol. Pure coco was my go to before I found out bout chow mix. Chow mix has one primary function for me- to cut down on coco usage lol. Straight coco works super, Jack @ TLC actually switched from chow to straight coco if I'm not mistaken.What do you guys think about using coco wit no perlite or aeration?
Totally fine. I don't like it though. I'm a root builder before anything else. You still get good roots but with aeration there is no comparisons. Also bennies like the porous aeration pieces to hide and dwell in. It's for the bennies man. LolWhat do you guys think about using coco wit no perlite or aeration?
Couldn't have said it better myself. This place has turned into exactly the kind of place I like to be. Never thought it would be this huge. Thanks to everyone.Thats whats great about this thread . different opinions, methods and no need for pissing contests as we all respect each other and know there is no , one way . no trolls or kids with over sensitive personality .
Yea T man I have to say add a bit o somin in it,What do you guys think about using coco wit no perlite or aeration?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?