Peat_Phreak
- 540
- 143
This just means they have a theory. The data is flawed because it's from different studies which means different strain, environment, ect.. Now a study has to be done on various strains in the same environment with various veg times by one team to prove the theory.
What they did is a meta analysis of many credible studies. This is a common practice in science. Think of it as an average of all the studies. Even tho it isn't technically an average.
This is far more credible than all the anecdotes bro scientists can provide.