here we go again...

babyhughie586 · Oct 19, 2013

smokie said:
Top pick are alot smaller plants, so they will have fatter buds but less of them, bottom pic are larger plants in a UC so it is possible. You really dont know unless you weighed it personally TBH.
I copied a pic of the size of the plants for reference from the other thread, sometimes just the top canopy shot can be misleading.

Either way both pics look nice.

Damn all this time ive been doing it wrong.... Smaller plants get bigger fatter buds than big plants grown in the UC??? lmao

Come on dude, think about what u said for a second.. With the pics i posted (not my grows btw) i can tell you i dont doubt that first pic for a minute when he said he hit 23ps... I have seen that much in a room before and yes that is what it looks like... Not what Q9 put up... Anyone that has grown anything over 8ps in a room will tell you the same thing...

Also are are you kidding me?? You think the top pic has less buds than the bottom Q9's pic??? No it has more buds per sq. foot than Q9 AND bigger buds and its in a MUCH larger space and under more light... The reason i posted that pic is because that is what 23lbs looks like in a room.. Q9's is a fraction of that room.. Im not gonna say another thing until Q9 chimes in, i feel like im beating a dead horse...

Quantum9 · Oct 21, 2013

You guys are so funny... If i post there is a problem, if i dont post, there is a problem.

I realize some of you are trying really hard to make a name for yourself, even if its for having the loudest mouth, or talking the most shit; but i just don't have the time for it. We have continually raised our prices to discourage clients, as we simply have too much work.

Anyway, as i said it was almost 2 per 600. The numbers were 1.69 or 1.72 lbs per light, something like that. As I stated back when i started to post these pics, at many peoples request; I was remotely overseeing this grow.

I will say that this client has been working with cch20 for a long time, and questioning the honesty is not a possibility for people of this kind of integrity.

Quantum9 · Oct 21, 2013

Amber said:
View attachment 345739

LMFAO. You fucking rock Amber.

babyhughie586 · Oct 21, 2013

Quantum9 said:
You guys are so funny... If i post there is a problem, if i dont post, there is a problem.

I realize some of you are trying really hard to make a name for yourself, even if its for having the loudest mouth, or talking the most shit; but i just don't have the time for it. We have continually raised our prices to discourage clients, as we simply have too much work.

Anyway, as i said it was almost 2 per 600. The numbers were 1.69 or 1.72 lbs per light, something like that. As I stated back when i started to post these pics, at many peoples request; I was remotely overseeing this grow.

I will say that this client has been working with cch20 for a long time, and questioning the honesty is not a possibility for people of this kind of integrity.

whatever u say champ.. . I think your ego is too big to admit when your wrong as ive learned before this... Im not sure if dude weighed wet, maybe he weighed pre trim with all the big ass stems still in tacked.. but their is NO way that is anything close to 20 dried trimmed jarred and ready for a discpencary... I think you would know better than this because u have soo much business...

GR33NL3AF · Oct 21, 2013

You've made your point Hughie, move on.

gooey · Oct 21, 2013

who the fuck cares, only person who should care about that number is the dude in charge of that room. enough dick measuring and doubting. People act like they can tell from PICTURES who has the most weight, such a joke. Thanks for sharing Q9.

midwestdensies · Nov 12, 2013

Ever think to put some cookies under the cookie sheets? Pure baking action! Fwiw I've gotten a hair under 2 lb under a 600. It's well documented in my journal. The room is capable of 12 lb easy off 7 600s. Those plants have good height to them and bubba is densy up and down. I believe for damn sure this was achieved. Never had a reason to believe otherwise. Thanks ds/q9 for all your contributions.

Mr_GreenGenes · Nov 12, 2013

If you aint payin the bills why the fuck does it matter if its 2oz's or 2 lbs per?? Some peeps need to get a goddamn grip on reality and quit with the shit slingin. Fuckin room looked killer regardless what it yielded IMO Q9. MGG

UCMENOW · Nov 12, 2013

Pretty weak to call someone out on yields based on pics and then use a pic as proof of your point?

IMO, I'd doubt those little lollipop plants gave the yield suggested. But I would never call someone out on it without proof. Especially someone who's contributed as much as Q9/DS has leading up to this.

Fuck lollipops, I'll take trees please :)

GR33NL3AF · Nov 12, 2013

UCMENOW said:
Pretty weak to call someone out on yields based on pics and then use a pic as proof of your point?

IMO, I'd doubt those little lollipop plants gave the yield suggested. But I would never call someone out on it without proof. Especially someone who's contributed as much as Q9/DS has leading up to this.

Fuck lollipops, I'll take trees please :)

Jesus!^^ Nice UCME

midwestdensies · Nov 12, 2013

That's what I'm talking about!!

Amber · Nov 14, 2013

UCMENOW said:
Pretty weak to call someone out on yields based on pics and then use a pic as proof of your point?

IMO, I'd doubt those little lollipop plants gave the yield suggested. But I would never call someone out on it without proof. Especially someone who's contributed as much as Q9/DS has leading up to this.

Fuck lollipops, I'll take trees please :)

Nice pics

Amber · Nov 16, 2013

UCMENOW said:
View attachment 351105 View attachment 351106
Pretty weak to call someone out on yields based on pics and then use a pic as proof of your point?

IMO, I'd doubt those little lollipop plants gave the yield suggested. But I would never call someone out on it without proof. Especially someone who's contributed as much as Q9/DS has leading up to this.

Fuck lollipops, I'll take trees please :)

Curious about the elevated floor under the buckets. What is the purpose of that?

Topofthecrop · Nov 18, 2013

Amber said:
Nice pics

Yes, liked to know also.

Very clean looking shop I might add. What kind of wattage are you pushing there. Are you running CO2 also?

Papa · Nov 18, 2013

UCMENOW, are those old pics or are you still running 13 gal buckets with uniseals? and i just figured out the elevated floor. :D i'm betting the concrete wasn't level, which would impact the water level in the buckets from one end of the system to the other.

Amber · Nov 18, 2013

Papa said:
UCMENOW, are those old pics or are you still running 13 gal buckets with uniseals? and i just figured out the elevated floor. :D i'm betting the concrete wasn't level, which would impact the water level in the buckets from one end of the system to the other.

That was my first guess as this was a problem that we had. We ended up raising the entire floor to make it level never thought to just raise up the buckets like that but I think that would be great for putting air pumps in maybe with some ducted fresh cool air with no co2. I better stop thinking like that though cause that sounds like a project.

redwhiteblue · Nov 21, 2013

UCMENOW said:
View attachment 351105 View attachment 351106
Pretty weak to call someone out on yields based on pics and then use a pic as proof of your point?

IMO, I'd doubt those little lollipop plants gave the yield suggested. But I would never call someone out on it without proof. Especially someone who's contributed as much as Q9/DS has leading up to this.

Fuck lollipops, I'll take trees please :)

The second photo is the definition of "how to make a grown man cry..."

Alice D · Nov 26, 2013

redwhiteblue said:
The second photo is the definition of "how to make a grown man cry..."

That's some funny shit because I was thinking the same damn thing. Good call redwhiteblue!

Alice D · Nov 26, 2013

UCMENOW said:
View attachment 351105 View attachment 351106
Pretty weak to call someone out on yields based on pics and then use a pic as proof of your point?

IMO, I'd doubt those little lollipop plants gave the yield suggested. But I would never call someone out on it without proof. Especially someone who's contributed as much as Q9/DS has leading up to this.

Fuck lollipops, I'll take trees please :)

I pick trees too. I wish you would stick around and play for awhile UCMENOW I know there are a lot of farmers that would like to chat with you. Or at least I would. Much respect your doing things proper. Passion I love it.

redwhiteblue · Dec 2, 2013

Alice D said:
That's some funny shit because I was thinking the same damn thing. Good call redwhiteblue!

Like kanye west in that song where he keeps going "racks on racks on racks!"

here we go again...

here we go again...

babyhughie586

Quantum9

Quantum9

babyhughie586

GR33NL3AF

gooey

midwestdensies

Mr_GreenGenes

UCMENOW

GR33NL3AF

midwestdensies

Amber

Amber

Topofthecrop

Papa

Amber

redwhiteblue

Alice D

Alice D

redwhiteblue

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency