The correct number of words in the definition is 320,
9,680 less than yer bombasticism;
next time you're in court have your lawyer
use yer Internet Dictionary,
instead of Black's Law Dictionary--
all them pesky definitions an' all...
You do realize I was exaggerating, and you actually took the time to count the words...... Kind of lame dude.
My point remains, my definition is in Websters, the most used dictionary on the planet. Your definition was wrote up by a team of California lawyers. Once again, I will take the definition used by all people in the world, over the period of the entire human history. However you can go with what the lawyers wrote up over the last decade. If I find my self in court defending whether or not this is a drought, then in that case you MIGHT be right. In any other common sense situation, the definition I posted is right. Sorry, lawyers suck and you would have to be a fool to go off a lawyers definition of anything. Like I said before, bureaucratic B.S. 100%.
Honestly Geo, are you serious with this? Are you really having a hard time with the simple definition of "drought." They have really done a number on your mind. We both have expressed our point of view on what a drought is, so no reason to continue to beat that dead horse. However, maybe you could tell me what it would take to get out of the drought? How much rain? Blaze says it could take up to centuries. What's your take?