Log In Register

My Preference when smoke time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hashman925
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

My Preference when smoke time

Hashman925 99 Replies 11,997 Views
Page 3 of 5 · Replies 41–60 of 100
I could regurgitate info and post clips to "defend" my point but i perfer to go off my own experience. Bubble results vary strain to strain. First off i dont use a 8 bag system. I use 3 bags out of my set. 160, 90, 25. And the 25 yields the best results when done this way. Trich heads range in size and using the 3 bags i use captures a wider range of heads. Its processed using Frenchys method which is why its pressed together and then its cured. I make exceptional hash, its my perfered smoke. Im in the California eastbay and would meet up at any time to prove so. Now that you have some actual information on my methods you can come to an educated conclusion on my final product. I do agree after being filtered through 8 bags by the time you get to the 25 its crap. But thats not the case here...
frenchys method does not use a 25,. his like me is a 45 micron for the bottom bag,.
your method does collect all trichome heads but your also getting more contaminate and broken heads/stalks,.
just saying
as i like the chunks you got there,..
you’ll notice if using a lighter to see how it melts,. is it a quick even melt than bubble or an uneven melt little bubbling charring, what’s it look like after cooling etc etc,.
either way good job,..
 
Only the best..enjoy!
Notice how it bends and not breaks. Its the high THC content that makes it so pliable. Low THC content will crumble and fall apart. And damn sure wont roll into a ball with such a glossy outter texture. View attachment 2145689
 

Attachments

  • 20240406_082706.jpg
    20240406_082706.jpg
    184.7 KB · Views: 7
Id love to see something you have produced that even comes close the the quality of what i produce. And my comment is ABSOLUTELY 100% true.
For instance, what the 160 bag produces COULD NEVER be molded. Why? Too many impurities...hence the name "junk bag".
 
Id love to see something you have produced that even comes close the the quality of what i produce. And my comment is ABSOLUTELY 100% true.
well your starting to stand out like a sore thumb with info like that,.
IMG 1119
IMG 1111
IMG 1109
IMG 1123
IMG 1019
IMG 0665
IMG 0662
IMG 0661
IMG 0354
IMG 9951
IMG 9946
IMG 9919
IMG 9926
IMG 9915
IMG 9872
IMG 7434
IMG 2765
IMG 2631
IMG 8648

and there’s waaay more,.
look i actually know my stuff,.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1010.jpeg
    IMG_1010.jpeg
    118.6 KB · Views: 9
frenchys method does not use a 25,. his like me is a 45 micron for the bottom bag,.
your method does collect all trichome heads but your also getting more contaminate and broken heads/stalks,.
just saying
as i like the chunks you got there,..
you’ll notice if using a lighter to see how it melts,. is it a quick even melt than bubble or an uneven melt little bubbling charring, what’s it look like after cooling etc
Looks as good as mine. Now i really dont understand your comments. Enjoy.
 
frenchys method does not use a 25,. his like me is a 45 micron for the bottom bag,.
your method does collect all trichome heads but your also getting more contaminate and broken heads/stalks,.
just saying
as i like the chunks you got there,..
you’ll notice if using a lighter to see how it melts,. is it a quick even melt than bubble or an uneven melt little bubbling charring, what’s it look like after cooling etc etc,.
either way good job,..
I said i process with Frenchys method not collect. And i only mentioned it to explain why its pressed. In response to a previous comment stating its not as strong when mushed which is absurd.
 
I came on simply sharing my smoking preference. I had nothing negative to say. Im simply responding to the negative being said about me. Im fine and done with it. Forums would be great if it weren't for the negative bs involved.
 
Ive watched plenty of Nicks videos. Those are definitely his pics, he's pretty much the hash guru around here.

Yours looks good too, I'd leave it at that 🙂
Again...im simply sharing my smoke preference. Go to the beginning and see what comments took this post on a turn for the worst. Im not here to compare and insult like your "guru". Im here to share. Thats it. Place blame where it belongs
 
Again...im simply sharing my smoke preference. Go to the beginning and see what comments took this post on a turn for the worst. Im not here to compare and insult like your "guru". Im here to share. Thats it. Place blame where it belongs
I believe in "if have nothing positive to say, dont say nothing at all". But thats too much like right for most to understand. I see if i were asking anything other than other smoke preferences when it comes to hash. But thats not the case. Your guru clearly felt "challenged" after seeing my results and felt the need to go the immature route he or she went with his/her comments.
 
Hashman925 said:
Id love to see something you have produced that even comes close the the quality of what i produce.

Then gets mad when someone does

Your weird
 
Page 3 of 5 · Replies 41–60 of 100
Back
Top Bottom