There is
nothing wrong with making a living, is there? Call it greed if you like, I call it making a living. If I spend my own money, time and use my own space for growing more than just my own, is it really wrong to want some compensation? This should be no different than anything else in that regard.
The Oakland thing is saying that ONLY those 4 will be able to supply the Dispensaries, and that any other grow, except personal only...will be illegal-- At least that is how I am understanding it--
If I am wrong, will someone pls clarify??
So 215 won't be effect huh???
That's the rub, will 215 be affected? John Russo (the city's attorney) has advised the city council that their plan is not only against federal law, it is against STATE law. I believe that was in the LA Times article, which was the only one that gave a vote count, with Nancy Nadel voting no (surprising, that woman's got her fingers in some very chocolatey and rich pies) and Jean Quan abstaining after talking up this measure like it's the next best thing after sliced bread and flushing toilets.
So, how's this city council going to work something that violates their own state's laws? That's the next thing to watch for. Suits could ensue.
is this only for oakland?
Yes, only for Oakland. All of it, beautiful glorious Oakland.