growsince79
- Posts
- 9,063
- Reactions
- 15,609
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2020
- Points
- 313
So it would it be fair to say - if you want to grow the GOAT, you have to do photo's.
So it would it be fair to say - if you want to grow the GOAT, you have to do photo's.doubtful. But better than plenty I’ve smoke and seen. Difference negligible IMO. If cloning/breeding not in your plans, then I see no reason to avoid them. On a day to day, they go toe to toe with other smoke out there. Not like I have wagyu and crystal with every meal.
Well, since its personal use, the only opinion that matters is mine. I'm always trying to find and grow the finest smoke I've ever had. I've smoked and grown a long time and have some very potent strains that are hard to beat. So I think I have a better chance of winning with photos.Idk. That seems like a wildly subjective and unverifiable assertion. GOAT according to who? Additionally, people argue all the time about genetics and beans. Quality and price. So not like the pursuit of the absolute objective “best” the sole goal anyways.
I grow both. counting seedlings, I have 17 photos going and 2 autos. Not like I’m some agent for Big Auto. But run after run I’ve been impressed. And I’m not hunting these. They’re just one pop.
Just up potted to 3 g which I am pretty sure is their final .I start mind in solos - transplant early to avoid stress is all ur fine
My autos have contended with photos, so I’ll continue to grow them. I know I’m not alone in that regard, but that argument has an element of an appeal to the masses fallacy.Well, since its personal use, the only opinion that matters is mine. I'm always trying to find and grow the finest smoke I've ever had. I've smoked and grown a long time and have some very potent strains that are hard to beat. So I think I have a better chance of winning with photos.
On the contrary in my opinion they much harder to control lite cycle s really the only advantage imoMaybe I've overlooked something but the advantage over photo period seem to be it is easier, not having to deal with light cycles and a predictible finish date if the supplier is accurate,you could get a grow with autos in before sexing photos,but photo you now have clones so you make up time (but it is more involved and perhaps it's not an option so that makes sense). Now photos are head to head and some photo strains will beat an auto from clone in flowering,so the time you initially gained now you will keep losing as the clones will grow into monsters the following year for outdoor use as well, easily out producing any auto. Obviously this is for people who also grow indoors for preservation,people get offended and that's crazy,I couldn't care less if someone told me photos sucked,I'll grow what works for me and my situation,it's just a debate.
So people grow autoflowers for couple different reasons 1 of the reason is that they can grow them quicker than an photo so there you can grow more each year and also people grow autoflowers because they are more hardy to pest and mold and also they flower by itself so you don’t need to switch any light schedules so you can have more light witch can also sometimes lead to bigger yieldsWhat are the reasons for growing auto as opposed to photoperiod? It is just because it's easier? Or faster? Are there advantages? Is it just convenience? How do the genetics stack up? What is the market for autos?
I would agree the quality can be up there but difficult to achieve for new growers imoIdk. That seems like a wildly subjective and unverifiable assertion. GOAT according to who? Additionally, people argue all the time about genetics and beans. Quality and price. So not like the pursuit of the absolute objective “best” the sole goal anyways.
I grow both. counting seedlings, I have 17 photos going and 2 autos. Not like I’m some agent for Big Auto. But run after run I’ve been impressed. And I’m not hunting these. They’re just one pop.
I haven't tried tissue culture, but the only way I know of to clone an auto is to keep it alive past harvest. It'll reveg. The new growth can be cloned, but the plants come out pretty small.Uh, why? Seriously.
I’d guess that any limiting factor not ideal for new growers, so in that regard I agree.I would agree the quality can be up there but difficult to achieve for new growers imo
So you let it grow nanners during revege, until seeds produce. Sorry I'm pretty new man?.....I haven't tried tissue culture, but the only way I know of to clone an auto is to keep it alive past harvest. It'll reveg. The new growth can be cloned, but the plants come out pretty small.
This a revegged auto (LSD 25)
View attachment 1245383
The powder is pollen, not PM.
Most photo hybrids can be grown in 3 months from seed. Not sure why you say 6.Bc in my state you can only grow 3 plants at a clip, so when 3 plants go into flower closet you start 3 more, this is a perpetual grow, it would be stupid to grow 3 photos and wait 6 months for 1 3 plant crop.
So, an auto, if done right, could be done quicker than that? From seed? I can't imagine. Because I'm getting ready to sow 3.Most photo hybrids can be grown in 3 months from seed. Not sure why you say 6.
Could be faster or slower.So, an auto, if done right, could be done quicker than that? From seed? I can't imagine. Because I'm getting ready to sow 3.
Except you can still clone a photo even in late flower.Someone posted, once you flip they are all autos!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?