GreenThumbBill
- 909
- 93
I didn't misunderstand you, you miscommunicated. What does it matter if questions for an interview are given beforehand? There is still a public record of the answer. RP has talked about his stance on the department of education and student loans many times and would have no reason to duck such a basic question intentionally. It's not like that is some tough zinger he has to contemplate at this point. Your accusation/implication of such is ridiculous.I sure did not need the clarification, but thanks, you just misunderstood what I was saying. Yes interviews are live, but they can also be devised and often times the questions are given before the interview takes place, can't they? I do not know for sure what interview you are referring too, nor the particulars of the interview, but I DO KNOW WHAT I SAW. That is the distinction I am making here, when talking about the difference of an interview and witnessing him in action. Sorry that I cannot get over the pamphlet, but when that much racist material comes out with your name on it I can't honestly think considering the time that he did not condone the messages. I don't believe him when he claims that he would not of voted for the 1964 civil rights act because of property rights issues and not Jim Crow. In reality the argument doesn't matter much, considering that Ron Paul is really insignificant in this election, for better or worse.
If RP is insignificant why have you taken time out of your day, two days in a row now, arguing with strangers to reveal how malignant he is?