QuarterbackMo
- 810
- 93
http://i306.invalid.com/albums/nn272/f1ydave/Grow/IMG_0611.jpg
He's built kind of like a root aphid.
I think we've found your new avatar, QuarterbackMo.
rofl i swear im about to use it roflmfao
http://i306.invalid.com/albums/nn272/f1ydave/Grow/IMG_0611.jpg
He's built kind of like a root aphid.
I think we've found your new avatar, QuarterbackMo.
No offense taken thats why the thread is here... My point in going through other peoples journals is this... How come you can look on any other fourm and see the perfection I keep preaching about but this one... Why is it everybodys plants in the uc look like they are sick? The only 2 grows i saw so far that looked pretty righteous is ucmenow and medmaneast... And i feel like my friends nutrient runs are important and relevant because they know how to grow really good so by them using them I would say I got a pretty good idea of what does what... As far as sticking to what I know yes I agree thats also why this thread is here... I have seen what hg can do and it doesnt perform right in the uc... I use hg in everything from my soilless all the way to the uc and its never let me down until it hits the uc. Everybody keep trying to call me a bum and shit but how come my uc grows look better then most of yours?... I posted 3 journals worth of pics and if you flip back a page or two those pics look just as good as ucmenow or medmaneast grow....on the flipside though its still not perfect... Im pressing the issue about the nutrients because I have seen what hg can do I fully believe in HG as I know it can kick out plants that imo cant get any better (really) ive seen it I know what its capable of and it works great in every other system but this one. Yes its a big deal for me cuz I feel for the 1200+ your gonna spend on the uc or the 800+ your gonna spend building your own you better be able to hit the fucking nail on the head. Good results arent good enough Im striving for perfection. So back to the original question... How come since day 1 of firing this up its never kicked out a perfectly healthy plant from start to finish? How come everybody else cant either(the journal links prove that point by far)... Im just gonna go ahead and start putting my experiments in motion I bet if its not the co2 gen its gonna be something in the uc and me rubbing it in peoples faces that i fuckin told you so lol.I'm not going to post pics, so you may just disregard but I do have a few comments.
Every system is different. Period. Each plant has its own preferences and every system has its own idiosyncrasies. You already know that you say? Then why are you contradicting yourself by saying "Why aren't the plants as good as this different system running the same way". Whatever the differences are from UC to straight up RDWC are apparently enough to make it impossible for you to achieve the same results from doing the same things. ~Fact
Comparing what nutes your buddies run in their systems and nutes that you've run in similar systems are moot. The only thing YOU should be comparing is what nutes YOU'VE run in the UC only. If you can't get what you want, try something different. You're trying so hard to hang on to something that works in another system. ~Fact
If you are truly committed to learning your UC system then scrap what you are trying to force and get back to the basics. Walk before you run. Get some base nutes recommended by UC and nothing else. Ditch your adds and co2. If you can't get to your PERFECT version of what you feel they should look like, then you shouldn't try and add all the other stuff.
Stop spending your time trying to look at everyone else's results. They are irrelevant to your world and whatever point you're trying to prove here. I personally have had great results from mine, and could care less about other ppls failures. Not to mention, you're going to get far more pics of problems than you will of successes. Not everyone posts grow logs.. most ppl just post when they need help.
I'm sorry if it sounds like I'm busting your balls too much. I can tell by your posts that you're a smart dude but I think sometimes we are all just too close to our own projects.
ps: nice avatar :)
I don't run a burner myself but have often wondered the affect of burners and a sealed environment.
NOx and SOx are usually by products of burning propane/NG, while I am sure manufactured burners adhere to strict standards, I can't help to think that there would be an accumulation over time.
Not saying this is the problem, but perhaps something to consider.
Cheers.
QB is not looking for any answers or solutions or he would find them easily. You can find fault in ANYTHING if you look hard enough. I do not even see the point of this thread. It damn sure has nothing to do with problem solving. That is one of the BEST features about the UC system; its ability to find any problems if they do arise and fix them easily, "by design".
The limits to this design is ONLY limited to the experience of the grower. Especially one that thinks he already knows or understands.
Cheers!
Your avatar ain't shit. I will get a way fatter shirtless fuck for my avatar.
That is all.
House and Garden Nutrients....Full line but did not run algen extract....Cal mag 5ml per gal with ro...
OG kush Abusive
View attachment 197218
White Widow Max
View attachment 197219
i have veg shots to but I think these say enough...Nothing wrong with the UC or house and garden nutrients....Med