H
heisen
- 2,626
- 263
Oh the ones I posted? That's mostly all In House Genetics gear - the first and most amazingly frosty one is Slurricane (Dosidos NorCal cut x Purple Punch).... Never seen anything else that tops it in terms of trich-density.Whos are those?
Not sure why its not letting me quote the pictures above with the frosty buds
I know what you didn't mention.... but should have ; )1 genetics
2 genetics
3 genetics
Did I mention genetics?
Like i said.I have grown the same under clones under HPS and CMH and the difference was to negligile to make that much of a difference.my wife is a a+ stoner and could not tellI know what you didn't mention.... but should have ; )
UV lighting
The concentration of THC increases linearly with increased UV.
~
That's not really supplemental UV. On the next run, consider trying dedicated UVB sources.... then bump this thread. I'll bet your answer will be different.Like i said.I have grown the same under clones under HPS and CMH and the difference was to negligile to make that much of a difference.
What were you using for UVB specifically?I have added UVA and UVB supplement lights
Sounds like they were too close.the only difference I have found is that they are less uv burned when I don't use them.
So you noticed increased trich-density?Adding supplemental uv didn't make too big of a difference on potency
just how it looked.
How many watts per-bulb?I added fixtures to my Spydrx rack.
If uv gave us more trichs
Then your lights were either too close.... or it was the 320-390 nm that cooked them.No, more of a redder look from being uv baked
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?