H
heisen
- 2,626
- 263
Whos are those?
Not sure why its not letting me quote the pictures above with the frosty buds
Not sure why its not letting me quote the pictures above with the frosty buds
Oh the ones I posted? That's mostly all In House Genetics gear - the first and most amazingly frosty one is Slurricane (Dosidos NorCal cut x Purple Punch).... Never seen anything else that tops it in terms of trich-density.Whos are those?
Not sure why its not letting me quote the pictures above with the frosty buds
I know what you didn't mention.... but should have ; )1 genetics
2 genetics
3 genetics
Did I mention genetics?
Like i said.I have grown the same under clones under HPS and CMH and the difference was to negligile to make that much of a difference.my wife is a a+ stoner and could not tellI know what you didn't mention.... but should have ; )
UV lighting
The concentration of THC increases linearly with increased UV.
~
That's not really supplemental UV. On the next run, consider trying dedicated UVB sources.... then bump this thread. I'll bet your answer will be different.Like i said.I have grown the same under clones under HPS and CMH and the difference was to negligile to make that much of a difference.
What were you using for UVB specifically?I have added UVA and UVB supplement lights
Sounds like they were too close.the only difference I have found is that they are less uv burned when I don't use them.
So you noticed increased trich-density?Adding supplemental uv didn't make too big of a difference on potency
just how it looked.
How many watts per-bulb?I added fixtures to my Spydrx rack.
If uv gave us more trichs
Then your lights were either too close.... or it was the 320-390 nm that cooked them.No, more of a redder look from being uv baked