Seamaiden
Living dead girl
- 23,596
- 638
Five, if the police have any reason to contact you, in this case noise ordinance, they can frisk you for "officer safety" . They cant just stop a random dude on the street and frisk. Just like a cop can stop you for a tail light out or tinted windows. Think the cop cares that your windows are tinted? Nope, he wants to see what else is going on in the car or on your person.
They saw a guy being a jackass, almost taunting them, so they used the noise ord as a reason to see if he was holding or had warrants. If nothing had happened out of the contact, no drugs, guns or dogs shot, Id guess no mention of the noise ord would have been made or citations issued.
theres a story about the new york police department and their "stop and frisk" policy. you should read up on it.Five, if the police have any reason to contact you, in this case noise ordinance, they can frisk you for "officer safety" . They cant just stop a random dude on the street and frisk. Just like a cop can stop you for a tail light out or tinted windows. Think the cop cares that your windows are tinted? Nope, he wants to see what else is going on in the car or on your person.
They saw a guy being a jackass, almost taunting them, so they used the noise ord as a reason to see if he was holding or had warrants. If nothing had happened out of the contact, no drugs, guns or dogs shot, Id guess no mention of the noise ord would have been made or citations issued.
theres a story about the new york police department and their "stop and frisk" policy. you should read up on it.
basically it's if your black or latino and your walking down the street they stop you, ask you to remove all the items from your pockets and then frisk you. the catch is, you just pulled out your dime bag or w/e and then it's in plan sight and arrest you..
Watch the interesting video at the end of this ..might just open up your eyes.
that's just one example..
That's called a terry search bro, and NO THEY CAN'T. You have the right to refuse or not consent to such a search. If they do search you, and you refuse you can sue the cop for a civil rights violation.
You really need to get your facts straight, spreading misinformation does not help people.
Not trying to be a dick, just letting you know you have it a little confused.
They have law class's at community collage you can take. ;) you might want to check up on that.
Ill tell ya a story, me a buddy were going to the d. We got flicked, Cop comes up says Blah blah, I think I smell marihuana, I want to search. We didnt have shit we were on our way, not our way back. It's my homies car, and he's says ok. I'm like fuck this dude tell him no. The cops like I got potable couse blah blah, and Im like what ever, it ain't my shit I can't say anything. So we get out, cop goes to my homie and says his speal about bazzookaz and hand grenades, dudes like no, cops asks to pat him down he's like what ever. Yea.
Cop comes to me ask my ass, I say I ain't got shit and I don't consent to a terry search and if you do search me Ill be filling a law suit in the morning on your ass.
Needless to say, I wasnt searched, now my homie at this point is fucked up. Says to the cop, YO that's fucked up, why didnt you search him. Cops says he told my I couldn't.
The homie was baffled for weeks, on what happend. He ended up going to the collage book store and buying all the books.:)
Moral of the story no your rights.
This is Hawthorne, and honestly, if this cat is known to the department, he was practically begging for it. Again, he brought the dog into the situation, not the cops. He failed to control the dog, not the cops. He was in the wrong as far as the dog being hurt goes, and didn't give enough consideration to the actual department he was dealing with.There were a dozen other lookie lous there recording sea that they said nothing to at all but they singled out the one guy who has a civil rights lawsuit against the department?And for a total bullshit reason,an excuse to hassle him really,so in my eyes they escalated the situation instead of diffusing it,he was no threat to them or anyone else they were just pissed and gonna get even and the dog who did nothing wrong paid the ultimate price.
Im the first one to be on the cops side IF they are right but thats about 50/50 anymore and not an acceptable ratio for those who are supposed to serve and protect.
Absolutely it was the owner's fault! Didn't you see that leash? Didn't he notice what was going on? He could have taken measures to protect the animal, like using an actual leash, but he didn't. Whose fault is that? The cops didn't compel him to bring the dog along for the ride.
Honestly, it's amazing to me how many people seem to think that how this guy handled the situation and his dog was perfectly fine. Or do you folks think that we should be treating all dogs like humans?
This is Hawthorne, and honestly, if this cat is known to the department, he was practically begging for it. Again, he brought the dog into the situation, not the cops. He failed to control the dog, not the cops. He was in the wrong as far as the dog being hurt goes, and didn't give enough consideration to the actual department he was dealing with.
You know I come from SoCal, and we all know that some departments are better than others. I'd rather deal with the sheriff of L.A. Co. than, say, LAPD, for example, pretty much ANY day of the week. Same in SD, I'd rather deal with the sheriff's department than SDPD. Why? Because, they're known for pulling tactics. If you already know that, why be surprised when you get exactly what you asked for?
First, I didn't watch the video, Dave watched it and reported what happened. I'm not going to watch it, either, I don't want to watch more dogs die because humans are fucking idiots. He told me that the guy put the dog into a/his car and it escaped.Oh No that dog was trying to protect the owner, that dog did NOT BITE THE COP, they could have let the guy take the Dog and put him back into the car, b/c either way the cops were goping to have to call the pound to come get the dog out of the car anyway, so instead of shooting the dog in front of the kids and people that were on the sidewalk they could have handled it way better then Shooting it not 1 but 4 FUCKING TIMES, 1 shot it might have live but 4 TIMES !!!!!!!!! Fuck that..:mad:
First, I didn't watch the video, Dave watched it and reported what happened. I'm not going to watch it, either, I don't want to watch more dogs die because humans are fucking idiots. He told me that the guy put the dog into a/his car and it escaped.
Second, the cops are not going to wait for the dog to bite them. I know this factually. Y'all remember my story about my sister's little 40lb border collie being shot to death in the street in front of their house? Five times that little dog was shot. A little 40lb dog, no recourse, and they weren't out on the street with the dog, they were at home and the dog was in her yard.
I'm not saying the cops handled it well, I'm placing a whole lot of responsibility on the owner's shoulders here because he HAD to know that this particular department is known for not playing nice, he had a very large breed on a completely insufficient 'leash,' and he was also already known to this department.
I'm not saying he had it coming, but he HAD to know it wasn't going to go well at all, and the dog paid the price. He will have no legal recourse here, none whatsoever. As far as I'm concerned he fucked up as badly as anyone else did. He doesn't get to shift all responsibility onto police because they shot his dog.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?